In this paper we review two qualitative interview studies, in which dilemmas of difference played a decisive role. With regard to the first study, which focused on the influence of migration backgrounds in student’s perception of Holocaust Education in Germany, we discuss several research decisions that were made to avoid methodological othering. Concerning a study on HIV risk behavior of gay and bisexual men, psychological challenges of a participa-tory approach that involved peer interviewers are outlined. We argue that strategies of recognition of the “other” - seen as a reflexive agent - have to be developed systematically as an ethical precondition of socially responsible research.
Können auch Kollektive ein Trauma erleiden? Um eine Antwort zu finden, wird einerseits der Traumabegriff genauer untersucht, andererseits geht es um die wichtige Frage, was wir eigentlich über kollektiv wirksame psychische Prozesse wissen: Massenpsychologie, kollektive Identität und kollektives Gedächtnis sind dafür Schlüsselkonzepte - nicht nur für die Sozialpsychologie -, die hier verständlich dargestellt und dann auf das Trauma bezogen werden. An Beispielen wie dem 11. September, dem Amselfeld-Mythos, dem Trauma der Sklaverei und dem Holocaust wird herausgearbeitet, wie unterschiedlich die Phänomene sind, die sich hinter dem Begriff des »kollektiven Traumas« verbergen.
This paper introduces reflection labs as a tool for researcher reflexivity in participatory collaborations. Participatory methodologies intend to achieve equal partnerships, co-production of knowledge and empowerment processes. In this agenda, reflexivity is key, not only for analytical reasons but also to address power inequalities, challenges in the partnerships and other ethical questions. In this paper, we describe the methodological underpinnings and empirical use of a tool we call a ‘reflection lab’. In a 3-year participatory study with refugees (EMPOW), funded by the German Research Foundation, various online and offline spaces were created for reflexivity among community and academic partners. Reflection labs were developed for the academic partners. The term ‘lab’ points to the somewhat experimental nature of this space. Combining different approaches to reflexivity in creative ways, reflection labs offer a space to explore researcher subjectivities. Using field notes, minutes and analytical notes (‘memos’) as a starting point, in-depth discussions foster critical self-reflexivity and provide peer feedback and support about academic researchers’ roles in participatory collaborations. The paper includes an example of a reflection lab that was organized virtually for more than 2 years due to Corona restrictions. By combining aspects of ‘strong reflexivity’ (analyzing researcher subjectivities for epistemic purposes) and ‘ethical reflexivity’ (addressing power inequalities and socio-political implications) reflection labs provide an innovative tool for an engaged, analytical research practice that pursues participatory goals and strives for ethical conduct and accountability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.