This study aimed to describe the medical, scientific, and sanitary aspects of lawsuits for drug supply filed with the Court of Paraíba (TJ-PB) against public officials in the state of Paraíba, Brazil. It was a descriptive and cross-sectional study, which had as source the Information System of the Paraíba Court. Drug processes judged at the second instance between the years 2009 and 2010 with a final decision already made at the time of consultation were analyzed. About the scientific evidences of efficacy and safety, drugs were evaluated through systematic reviews in the Brazilian Cochrane Centre database. The groups of drugs most frequently requested were the antineoplastic agents, followed by insulin and angiotensin II antagonists. The antineoplastic agents' costs accounted for 76% of the total spent on litigation, representing an approximate cost of R$ 343,000 per month, of which an item had no record in Brazilian sanitary organ. The results pointed to a high number of lawsuits with prevalence of requests for drugs standardized by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), of which the antineoplastic agents are noteworthy and reinforce the need for revision of the National Pharmaceutical Assistance Policy, both regarding deployment strategies as the urgency to expand the list of drugs available through SUS.
Objetivo Visando conhecer o impacto das demandas judiciais sobre a organização dos serviços públicos de saúde, realizou-se uma revisão sistemática com enfoque na "judicialização da saúde" para fornecimento de medicamentos. Métodos Foram analisados artigos originais publicados no período de 2007 a 2011, na literatura nacional e internacional, resultando no total de 49239 artigos disponíveis nas bases de dados Science Direct e BIREME. Resultados: A pesquisa indicou predominância da bibliografia proveniente do Brasil, principalmente do sudeste, bem como de estudo realizado na Colômbia. Discursão Dentre os pleitos, configuraram-se como principais agravos relatados as doenças crônicas, podendo-se citar: diabetes, hipertensão, cânceres e artrite reumatóide. Por serem afecções parte de programas específicos do Sistema Único de Saúde, a dificuldade de acesso a esses fármacos e consequente judicialização da saúde demonstrou a fragilidade das políticas públicas existentes. Conclusão Por fim, conclui-se que a via judicial, apesar de ser uma estratégia para garantir o acesso ao medicamento, apresenta inabilidade para lidar com o julgamento das ações e gera, dessa forma, distorções no fluxo dos sistemas públicos.Palavras-chave: Direito à saúde, política nacional de medicamentos, sistema único de saúde (fonte: DeCS, BIREME).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.