Uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis may help identify model error; however, efficacy of UQ to filter predictions varies considerably between datasets and featurization/model types.AMPL is open source and available for download at
We have developed a mathematical framework for describing a bispecific monoclonal antibody interaction with two independent membrane-bound targets that are expressed on the same cell surface. The bispecific antibody in solution binds either of the two targets first, and then cross-links with the second one while on the cell surface, subject to rate-limiting lateral diffusion step within the lifetime of the monovalently engaged antibody-antigen complex. At experimental densities, only a small fraction of the free targets is expected to lie within the reach of the antibody binding sites at any time. Using ordinary differential equation and Monte Carlo simulation-based models, we validated this approach against an independently published anti-CD4/CD70 DuetMab experimental data set. As a result of dimensional reduction, the cell surface reaction is expected to be so rapid that, in agreement with the experimental data, no monovalently bound bispecific antibody binary complexes accumulate until cross-linking is complete. The dissociation of the bispecific antibody from the ternary cross-linked complex is expected to be significantly slower than that from either of the monovalently bound variants. We estimate that the effective affinity of the bivalently bound bispecific antibody is enhanced for about 4 orders of magnitude over that of the monovalently bound species. This avidity enhancement allows for the highly specific binding of anti-CD4/CD70 DuetMab to the cells that are positive for both target antigens over those that express only one or the other We suggest that the lateral diffusion of target antigens in the cell membrane also plays a key role in the avidity effect of natural antibodies and other bivalent ligands in their interactions with their respective cell surface receptors.
The ability to explain distribution patterns from drug physicochemical properties and binding characteristics has been explored for more than 200 compounds by interrogating data from quantitative whole body autoradiography studies (QWBA). These in vivo outcomes have been compared to in silico and in vitro drug property data to determine the most influential properties governing drug distribution. Consistent with current knowledge, in vivo distribution was most influenced by ionization state and lipophilicity which in turn affected phospholipid and plasma protein binding. Basic and neutral molecules were generally better distributed than acidic counterparts demonstrating weaker plasma protein and stronger phospholipid binding. The influence of phospholipid binding was particularly evident in tissues with high phospholipid content like spleen and lung. Conversely, poorer distribution of acidic drugs was associated with stronger plasma protein and weaker phospholipid binding. The distribution of a proportion of acidic drugs was enhanced, however, in tissues known to express anionic uptake transporters such as the liver and kidney. Greatest distribution was observed into melanin containing tissues of the eye, most likely due to melanin binding. Basic molecules were consistently better distributed into parts of the eye and skin containing melanin than those without. The data, therefore, suggest that drug binding to macromolecules strongly influences the distribution of total drug for a large proportion of molecules in most tissues. Reducing lipophilicity, a strategy often used in discovery to optimize pharmacokinetic properties such as absorption and clearance, also decreased the influence of nonspecific binding on drug distribution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.