Changes in the economy and society lead to a growing necessity of financial education. In this context, we investigate the approaches to financial education in secondary schools in the United States and Germany. We seek to answer the question if and how the implementation of financial education is similar and different between the two countries. We address this question for financial education by comparing the educational conditions, coursework structures, content standards, instructional resources, and assessment within each country. Additionally, we focus on differences in cognitive structure of financial knowledge and understanding among students within each country. For this exploratory analysis, we used data from the Test of Financial Literacy that was administered to students in the United States and Germany ( n = 2326). The empirical results reveal differences in knowledge structures in specific content areas among students in the two countries. Possible reasons for such differences and other implications are discussed.
Financial competence is seen as a complex ability necessary for people to deal with personal financial issues on a daily basis. To foster young peoples’ financial competence via sophisticated and tailored educational programs, the identification of “competence gaps” through complex and authentic assessments is required. While a large number of assessment tools in the field of personal finance already exist, many of them suffer from different shortcomings concerning a competence-oriented approach. Therefore, we present an innovative way to assess students’ financial competence with a complex performance scenario about financial investment. The presented instrument is built on a specifically designed theoretical framework and addresses the need for holistic financial competence measurement. Results of pretesting trials indicate that the instrument is generally capable of measuring young learners’ financial competence, but challenges in scoring remain. Against this background, implications for the instrument’s iterative enhancement are presented and discussed with reference to validity and reliability properties, scoring issues, and statements about the overall feasibility of complex performance tasks in educational settings. The first draft of a scoring scheme is provided. The potential of the instrument in combination with modern technology-based measurement methods (eye tracking, emotion recognition) for competence assessment is described and suggestions for further research are outlined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.