Background: There is only limited information on the utility of urinary biomarkers in predicting long-term kidney function following acute kidney injury (AKI). The current study assessed whether urinary beta 2 microglobulin/creatinine (B2M/creat) and kidney injury molecule-1/creatinine (KIM-1/creat) ratios, measured in the early recovery phase of AKI, are predictive of kidney function at one year. Methods: This is a prospective study done in a tertiary care centre in South India, from March 2017 to December 2018. Adult patients who survived an episode of AKI were followed up for one year (n=125). B2M/creat and KIM-1/creat ratio were measured at two weeks and three months following AKI. Results: In the AKI survivors, the B2M/creat ratio at 2 weeks [18.3mg/g (IQR 2.3, 52.9)] and KIM-1/creat ratio [1.1 µg/g (IQR 0.5, 4.0) at two weeks were higher compared to healthy controls [B2M/creat ratio 0.35 mg/g (0.17,0.58) and KIM-1/creat ratio 0.40 µg/g (0.23,1.00); P=<0.001]. After adjusting for covariates, the eGFR and urinary B2M/creat ratio at two weeks following AKI were predictive of eGFR at one year (P<0.001). KIM-1/ creat ratios were not predictive of eGFR at one year. A urinary B2M/creat ratio of 10.85 at two weeks following AKI had an 85.5% sensitivity (95% CI 74, 93) and 64.3% (95% CI 53, 75) specificity to predict CKD at one year. An eGFR cutoff of 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at two weeks had a sensitivity of 81.8% (95% CI 69, 90) and specificity of 71.4% (95% CI 60, 81) for predicting CKD. The presence of either one criteria (urinary B2M/creat ratio >10.85 (mg/g) or eGFR <60 mL at two weeks) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 94%, 100%) in predicting CKD at one year. Conclusion: An eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 and elevated urinary B2M/creat ratio at two weeks following AKI is predictive of low eGFR at one year. Urinary KIM-1/creat ratios do not predict CKD progression.
BackgroundProteinuria and renal dysfunction is common in diabetic patients and may occur due to variety of causes. Nondiabetic renal diseases (NDRD) account for 30% of the renal biopsies, and idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is a common non diabetic glomerular disease that can exist alone or in combination with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Immunosuppressants used in iMN may be associated with complications of worsening glycemic control and recurrent infections. There is a paucity of literature on the clinical course, outcomes and treatment adverse effects of patients with iMN and diabetes.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of all diabetics, evaluated for NDRD and found to have iMN, between January 2000 and June 2015 in our institute.ResultsA total of 134 patients with diabetes were biopsied for NDRD and 16 patients had iMN. Mean ± standard deviation age was 54 ± 11.77 years and the median duration of diabetes was 9.4 years. Twelve patients had isolated iMN and four patients had iMN coexisting with DN. Response rates of 18%, 35.71% and 63.63% were seen with Modified Ponticelli (MP) regimen, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), respectively. Five patients developed treatment-related adverse effects significant enough to necessitate a treatment change. Worsening glycemic control was the most common side effect. Adverse effects were less with the MMF compared with the MP regimen and tacrolimus.ConclusionPatients with iMN coexisting with diabetes exhibit a poor response to the MP regimen. Treatment-related toxicity is less common with MMF in comparison with the MP regimen and tacrolimus-based regimen. An almost similar response was noted with MMF and tacrolimus-based regimen but there was more withdrawal from treatment due to toxicities observed in the latter.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.