Introduction The importance of mucociliary clearance (MCC) for the respiratory system homeostasis is clear. Therefore, evaluating this defense mechanism is fundamental in scientific research and in the clinical practice of pulmonology and of associated areas. However, MCC evaluation has not been so usual due to the complexity of methods that use radiolabeled particles. Nevertheless, as an interesting alternative, there is the saccharin transit time (STT) test. This method is reproducible, simple to perform, noninvasive, does not demand high costs, and has been widely used in studies of nasal MCC. Although the STT test is widely used, there is still lack of a detailed description of its realization. Objective The present literature review aims to provide basic information related to the STT test and to present the findings of the previous studies that used this method, discussing variations in its execution, possible influences on the obtained results and limitations of the method, as well as to relate our experience with the use of STT in researches. Data Synthesis There are several factors that can alter the results obtained from STT tests, which would raise difficulties with proper interpretation and with the discussion of the results among different studies. Conclusions Saccharin transit time is a widely used method for the evaluation of nasal MCC, and therefore, the standardization related to the previous and concurrent to test orientations, and also its execution, become essential to improve its accuracy, and allow comparisons among different studies.
BACKGROUND: Among the types of physical exercise, resistance exercises have been gaining significant attention in the COPD population. The aim of this study was to compare effects of conventional resistance training and of training by using elastic tubes on muscle strength, exercise capacity, and creatine kinase clearance in subjects with COPD. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects with COPD were randomized into the following: resistance training with the elastic tubing group and resistance training with the weight-machine training group (conventional resistance group), performed 3 times a week for 12 weeks. The subjects were submitted to spirometry, functional exercise capacity (the 6-min walk test), muscle strength (dynamometry), and the repetition maximum test. Differences between the initial and final evaluations (⌬) and the (final -initial evaluations)/initial evaluations ؋100 (⌬%) of each group were expressed as mean [95% CI]. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects (FEV 1 % predicted, 52 ؎ 18; years, 65 ؎ 8) completed the training program. Similar improvements were observed in both modalities on muscle strength (knee extension, ⌬%18 [6 to 29]; knee flexion, ⌬%35 [17 to 54]; elbow flexion, ⌬%28 [9 to 48]; shoulder abduction, ⌬%41 [25 to 58] and shoulder flexion, ⌬%31 [11 to 51] in the weight-machine training group (conventional resistance group); knee extension, ⌬%15 [8 to 21]; knee flexion, ⌬%28 [15 to 41]; elbow flexion, ⌬%36 [22 to 51]; and shoulder abduction, ⌬%43 [32 to 55] and shoulder flexion, ⌬%43 [25 to 61] in the elastic tubing group, P < .05 for intra-group analysis and P > .05 for between groups analysis), 6-min walk test (baseline 493 ؎ 67m vs 12 weeks 526 ؎ 78 in the weight-machine training group (P ؍ .10); baseline 493 ؎ 71 vs 12 weeks 524 ؎ 68 in the elastic tubing group (P < .01), P ؍ .88 between groups). The elastic tubing group had lower accumulated creatine kinase levels between 24 and 72 h ((⌬%؊24 [؊31 to 16] than subjects in the weight-machine training group ⌬%3 [؊21 to 28], P ؍ .042 between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Training with elastic resistance provided similar changes in muscle strength and exercise capacity to conventional resistance group in the subjects with COPD. The elastic tubing group had faster creatine kinase clearance after a training session than the weight-machine training group (conventional resistance group). The ease of its application associated with similar training benefits to conventional training supported its application in clinical routine.
Modelo do Estudo: Experimental. Objetivo(s) do estudo: Analisar o efeito agudo do exercício aeróbio em diferentes intensidades no transporte mucociliar de pacientes com DPOC, bem como investigar possíveis associações do sistema nervoso autônomo nesta resposta. Metodologia: Foram analisados 22 pacientes com DPOC que realizaram avaliação inicial para coleta de dados pessoais e espirometria a fim de avaliar a função pulmonar. Realizou-se um teste progressivo em esteira ergométrica para prescrição do exercício aeróbio. Por fim foram realizadas duas sessões de exercício aeróbio randomizadas em esteira ergométrica com intensidade de 60% e 90% do pico da velocidade atingida no teste incremental (vVO2pico) com pelo menos 24 horas de descanso entre elas. O transporte mucociliar foi avaliado antes e após realização do exercício por meio do teste do tempo de trânsito da sacarina (TTS). A avaliação da modulação autonômica foi realizada por meio da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca (VFC) a qual prosseguiu durante todo o protocolo. Resultados: Os valores obtidos no teste de TTS dos pacientes com DPOC após exercício aeróbio a 60% da vVO2pico (9,08 ± 4,96 minutos) foi menor comparado ao TTS antes do exercício (11,96 ± 6,31; p = 0,005). O que também ocorreu após exercício aeróbio a 90% da vVO2pico (8,90 ± 4,21 minutos) quando comparado ao momento basal (12,94 ± 7,22; p = 0,023). As análises de correlação entre os valores finais de TTS e índices da VFC não apontaram diferenças significativas. Conclusões: Pacientes com DPOC apresentaram aceleração da transportabilidade mucociliar frente a uma sessão de exercício aeróbio. Não foi possível observar associação da modulação autonômica nesta resposta após o exercício
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.