There is a great demand to develop new acoustic techniques to efficiently map the seabed and automate the interpretation of acoustic, sedimentological, and imaging data sets, eliminating subjectivity. Here, we evaluate the potential, limitations and complementariety of distinct supervised and automatic classification techniques in the mapping of reefs by comparing these results with a reference map. The study was carried out in the Abrolhos Continental Shelf (Eastern Brazilian Continental Margin) using a multibeam echosounder and side scan sonar (SSS) dataset. Two automatic supervised techniques were applied. A reference map was derived by detailed manual interpretation carried out by three experts. The two supervised classification techniques were: benthic terrain modeler (BTM), a morphometric classification with focus on spatial analyses of the bathymetric grid derivatives, and object-based image analysis (OBIA), a segmentation applied to the backscatter data from the SSS mosaic. Both automatic techniques obtained similar values of reef coverage area, but overestimated the reef area when compared with the reference map. The agreement between BTM and OBIA results and the reference map was 69% and 67%, respectively. Disagreement was mainly due to quantity of reef (both methods over-estimated reef), while the disagreement in spatial allocation was relatively low, it indicates that both methods are reasonable representation of the spatial patterns of reef. Efficient mapping of reef in the wider area of the Abrolhos Continental Shelf will be best achieved by a further development of automatic methods tested against reference maps obained from representative areas of the seabed. By combining the results of the two automatic methods, it was possible to create an ensemble map, which achieved better agreement with the reference dataset.
International audienc
The term hydrospatial first emerged in the early 2000’s in the UK. Since February 2020, the term hydrospatial has been reenergized, promoted and mentioned in many fora such as: International Hydrographic Conferences virtual and in person; and in international publications including the International Hydrographic Review (IHR) in its six last volumes. This note is intended to provide an update on where this term stands with respect to its usage, endorsement and meaning.
<p>SEA-KIT USV Maxlimer successfully carried out a 22 day (24hrs per day), uncrewed survey operation offshore the United Kingdom in July-August 2020. The uncrewed vessel was controlled and manoeuvred from an operation room based in Essex, UK, while the data acquisition was performed by alumni of the Nippon Foundation/GEBCO Training Program, through the Map the Gaps NPO, spread across 10 countries. One of the main objectives of the trans-ocean survey was to test the remote survey capabilities through satellite communications, and also promote the contribution to seafloor mapping. CARIS Onboard, incorporating the new Sonar Noise Classifier tool via the CARIS Mira AI platform, was deployed to autonomously process the survey data in real-time, and provide products that could be streamed daily from SEA-KIT to ensure operations were successful and to help train the classifier as required. The data was post-processed with CARIS HIPS and SIPS using conventional and Ai techniques, and gridded at 10 m. The collected data size was 52.2 GB, surveyed area depth range from 57m to 1362 with 470m mean depth and around 900 km<sup>2</sup> was totally covered.&#160; CARIS Mira AI with traditional QC approach reduced data processing time to 77% regarding the conventional path.</p><p>The high-resolution bathymetric dataset provided the first detailed picture of the Brenot Spur, adjacent to Dangeart Canyon. Three major submarine canyon systems can be identified, cross-cutting the continental shelf nearly perpendicularly. The main axis of the first canyon, located at the far northern part of the surveyed area, is oriented NE-SW and becomes wider downstream. Both of the flanks are highly carved by gullies and tributaries, especially along the northern flank, where a complex system is developed depicting well-developed amphitheatric heads, indicating retrogressive erosion. Moreover, this network shows a high degree of incision and narrow interfluves. The second major canyon trends ENE-WSW and is a multi-fed system consisting of three sub-canyons that coalesce at 1095 m water depth. Although tributaries bisect the flanks of this system, they are not mature and have not yet breached the continental shelf, but are mostly confined on the slope. The final canyon is narrower than the previous ones and its&#160; thalweg is nearly N-S oriented. Additionally, the flanks of the later differ substantially when it comes to their morphology. The western flank is undulated by linear wall gullies and several landslides indicated by the crescent like rim of high slope values, while the eastern flank is smooth and featureless. Along the SW continental slope, evidence for several old landslide events can be identified. The major failure scars are located right at the edge of the shelf at 560 m water depth.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.