RESUMO Objetivo conhecer as percepções dos profissionais da educação e da saúde acerca da autolesão não suicida em adolescentes. Método pesquisa qualitativa, tendo como referencial teórico o Interacionismo Simbólico. Coleta de dados realizada junto a 20 profissionais de uma escola e de uma Unidade de Saúde da Família de São Carlos-SP, por meio de grupos focais e diário de campo. A análise de dados se deu pela modalidade temática indutiva. Resultados revelou-se que a adolescência ainda é vista como período de transição, e a autolesão emerge como passageira e pela busca por atenção. Reforça-se a banalização, principalmente, pela crença do efeito contágio, em que os adolescentes reproduzem o ato realizado por pares. As relações familiares e com a Internet são sinalizadas como propagadoras do fenômeno. Frente a esses significados, o cuidado é fragilizado, baseado em ações pontuais. Conclusão e implicações para a prática os profissionais agem frente à autolesão na adolescência de acordo com os significados que são construídos por eles. É urgente a necessidade de educação permanente sobre tais questões, o delineamento de ações promotoras de saúde mental no contexto escolar e construção de protocolos para cuidado intersetorial.
Intervenções na escola para prevenção da violência nas relações de intimidade entre adolescentes: revisão integrativa da literatura Intervenciones en la escuela para prevenir la violencia en las relaciones íntimas entre adolescentes: revisión integradora de la literatura Diene Monique Carlos*; Ana Beatriz Campeiz**; Jorge Luiz da Silva***; Maria Isabel Domingues Fernandes****; Maria Neto da Cruz Leitão*****; Marta Angelica Iossi Silva******; Maria das Graças Carvalho Ferriani******* Abstract Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) in adolescence is a more serious problem because it negatively impacts the healthy development and is a precursor to domestic and family violence. Objectives: To identify the types of primary IPV prevention interventions that have been implemented in school settings. Methodology: Integrative literature review in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Lilacs, and SciELO virtual library. Results: Twelve studies were included in this review. Interventions were identified based on 3 categories: Multicomponent interventions; Skill-building interventions; and Theater/role-playing interventions. Similar results were found in all studies. Population and approach specificities were discussed. Conclusion: In this review, important contributions to IPV prevention interventions were presented, such as the need for theoretical background, life-context approach, and intervention towards bystanders.
Objective: To analyze adolescents’ perceptions about intimate violence from the perspective of the Complexity Paradigm. Method: A qualitative approach configured as strategic social study. The study participants were adolescents between 15 and 18 years old, attending high school in two public schools in a city in the interior of São Paulo State, Brazil. Data collection was performed through a focus group and a semi-structured interview as a complement. Data analysis was based on the dialogical, organizational and holographic principles of the Complex Paradigm. Results: The study included 39 adolescents (14 males and 25 females). Through the emerging categories, it was noticed that intimate violence occurs through dialogical affection-jealousy/control by a naturalization of violent acts which permeates gender, cultural and social issues, and by technology as preponderant for intimate violence among adolescents, denoting new forms of control and coercion. Conclusion: The study introduces aspects present in intimate violence among adolescents, presenting them in an articulate and interdependent way. These aspects constitute a relevant contribution to the actions of health professionals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.