The purpose of this entry is to briefly describe a study for which mixed methods were best suited. This study examined the growth of two groups of preservice literacy teachers in their abilities to recognize salient features of children's reading development. Quantitative data were used to ascertain growth, while qualitative data were used to situate the learning experiences in which this growth occurred. A purely quantitative study could have revealed growth but little would be known about how that growth occurred. A purely qualitative study could have provided a rich description of two different ways to implement case‐based instruction but would not provide information about the growth of the learners. A mixed design helped to account for both growth of the learners and an understanding of the interventions experienced by each group of learners.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.