In the context of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), volunteers are not involved in the decisional processes. Moreover, VGI systems do not offer advanced historical analysis tools. Therefore, in this work, we propose to use Data Warehouse (DW) and OLAP systems to analyze VGI data, and we define a new DW design methodology that allows involving volunteers in the definition of analysis needs over VGI data. We validate it using a real biodiversity case study.
In this paper we present a user experience report on a Group Decision Support System. The used system is a Collaborative framework called GRoUp Support (GRUS). The experience consists in three user tests conducted in three different countries. While the locations are different, all three tests were run in the same conditions: same facilitator and tested process. In order to support the end-users. we teach the system in two different ways: a presentation of the system, and a video demonstrating how to use it. The main feedback of this experience is that the teaching step for using Collaborative tools in mandatory. The experience was conducted in the context of decision-making in the agriculture domain.
With the maturity of crowdsourcing systems, new analysis possibilities appear where volunteers play a crucial role by bringing the implicit knowledge issued from practical and daily experience. At the same time, data warehouse and OLAP systems represent the first citizen of decision-support systems. They allow analyzing a huge volume of data according to the multidimensional model. The more the multidimensional model reflects the decision-makers' analysis needs, the more the DW project is successful. However, when volunteers are involved in the design of DWs, existing DW design methodologies present some limitations. In this work, the authors present the main features of volunteer data warehouse (VDW) design, and they study the main existing DW design methodology to find out how they can contribute to fulfil the features needed by this particular DW approach. To provide a formal framework to classify existing work, they provide a study of differences between classical DW users and volunteers. The paper also presents a set of open issues for VDW.
The selection of the most adapted project management method (PMM) can contribute to the success of information technology (IT) projects and hence the company's optimized profitability and operability. Due to many PMMs known for their operational advantages, and with the variety of companies’ strategies and policies, the decision‐making process of selecting the best‐suited PMM can get cumbersome, and some unfounded practices could, consequently, mislead its involved leaders. We propose in this work a methodological approach of decision analysis that allows a structured, reproducible, and group decision support system‐assisted execution. The methodology was fully executed and evaluated with three real case studies of IT projects, and further improvements and research perspectives were identified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.