Background: Hand-injured patients seen in the emergency department can often be followed as outpatients for definitive care and rehabilitation. Many face barriers to continuing care in the outpatient setting that impact quality of care delivery. The authors aimed to evaluate patterns of outpatient follow-up after initial emergency department evaluation of traumatic hand injuries, identify factors associated with poor follow-up, and suggest areas for improvement. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the authors reviewed records of adult patients with acute hand injuries referred for outpatient follow-up after initial plastic surgery consultation in the emergency department of a single urban Level I trauma center over a 12-month period (n = 300). Patients were grouped by insurance (i.e., no insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or private). Outcomes included completion of outpatient follow-up, hand therapy participation, and emergency department return visits. Results: Factors significantly associated with failure to follow up included male sex (OR, 3.58; 95 percent CI, 1.57 to 8.16), uninsured status (OR, 3.47; 95 percent CI, 1.48 to 8.16), Medicaid insurance (OR, 4.46; 95 percent CI, 1.31 to 15.25), and lack of a driver’s license (OR, 3.35; 95 percent CI, 1.53 to 7.34). Hand therapy attendance and unexpected emergency department return visits also varied significantly by insurance type (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is a significant disparity in the use of outpatient care after emergency department visits for acute hand injuries. Uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients are significantly less likely to initiate recommended hand specialty follow-up, and significantly less likely to complete follow-up even when established with an outpatient clinic. Future research should evaluate targeted interventions for at-risk patients.

Giant cell tumor of the distal radius is a rare, locally destructive, and frequently recurrent tumor. We present a case of Campanacci Grade III giant cell tumor of the distal radius with pathologic fracture and cortical destruction which was treated with neoadjuvant denosumab. This facilitated en-bloc resection of the entire distal radius, including the articular surface, while minimizing tumor contamination. Reconstruction was accomplished using a vascularized ulnar transposition flap to facilitate radioulnoscapholunate fusion, which was fixated using a long-stem contralateral variable angle locking volar distal radius plate in a dorsal position. This case illustrates multidisciplinary management of a challenging reconstructive problem and demonstrates a novel strategy for fixation which repurposes familiar and readily available hardware to provide optimal osteosynthesis.

No abstract

Learning Objectives: After studying this article and accompanying videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand and apply the principles of nerve transfer surgery for nerve injuries. 2. Discuss important considerations when performing nerve transfers, such as aspects of surgical technique and perioperative decision-making. 3. Understand indications for end-to-end versus supercharged reverse end-to-side nerve transfers. 4. Understand an algorithm for treating nerve injuries to include the indications and surgical techniques of five nerve transfers commonly performed for the treatment of isolated upper extremity nerve injuries. 5. Understand the outcomes and postoperative management of the discussed nerve transfers. Summary: Nerve transfers are gaining wide acceptance because of their superior results in the management of many nerve injuries of the upper extremity. This article presents five nerve transfers for the treatment of isolated nerve injuries in the authors' upper extremity nerve practice that offer reliable results. Indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and postoperative management are reviewed. To maximize functional outcomes in patients with nerve injuries, the treatment should be individualized to the patient, and the principles for nerve transfers as described herein should be considered.