Objective: We reported the demographic, clinical, radiologic, preoperative and postoperative characteristics and outcomes on patients of appendix mucocele that presented with or operated for acute appendicitis or acute abdomen. Methods: A retrospective study. Patients who were presented or operated for acute appendicitis or acute abdomen and had an operative histopathological diagnosis as appendix mucocele (simple mucocele, mucinous cystadenoma, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma) were included. Demographic, clinical, radiologic, preoperative and postoperative data of eligible cases were evaluated. Results: From January 2003 to February 2010, a total of 2120 patients with the pre-operative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were treated in our center, and nine (0.42%) patients were diagnosed to have mucocele of the appendix. Seven patients (78%) were female. Average age of the patients was 59.5 (range=25-74). Major complaint was right lower quadrant pain in eight (89%) patients. In preoperative ultrasonographic examination of the patients, appendiceal cystic masses (mucocele) were diagnosed in four (44.5%) patients. In histopathologic examination, the number of patients diagnosed to have simple mucocele was two (22%) , mucinous cystadenoma was four (45%), and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma was three (33%). No postoperative morbidity or mortality was noted. Conclusion: Appendix mucocele is a rare disease and it is usually diagnosed histopathologicaly in appendectomy specimens. When a cystic mass in appendix is seen during operation, appendiceal mucocele should be kept in mind to avoid iatrogenic perforation causing pseudomyxoma peritonei and possible concomitant malignancies should be searched. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2011;18:144-149)

Regarding the complications of peptic ulcer, a perforation remains the most important fatal complication. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine relations between postoperative morbidity and comorbid disease or perioperative risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer. In total, 239 patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in Ege University General Surgery Department, between June 1999 and May 2013 were included in this study. The clinical data concerning the patient characteristics, operative methods, and complications were collected retrospectively. One hundred seventy-five of the 239 patients were male (73.2%) and 64 were female (26.8%). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 1 in the patients without morbidity, but mean ASA score was 3 in the morbidity and mortality groups. Primary suture and omentoplasty was the selected procedure in 228 of the patients. Eleven patients underwent resection. In total, 105 patients (43.9%) had comorbidities. Thirtyseven patients (67.3%) in the morbidity group had comorbid diseases. Thirteen (92.9%) patients in the mortality group had comorbid diseases. Perforation as a complication of peptic ulcer disease still remains among the frequent indications of urgent abdominal surgery. Among the analyzed parameters, age, ASA score, and having comorbid disease were found to have an effect on both mortality and morbidity. The controversial subject in the present study is regarding the duration of symptoms. The duration of symptoms had no effect on mortality nor morbidity in our study.

Treatment options of pilonidal sinus, which has high recurrence rates, is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyze for possible factors affecting recurrence. Forty-one patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus were included in this study. Of them, 33 were male and 9 were female (mean age, 24.9 years; age range, 16-42). Factors (i.e., risk factors) were detected in 32 patients. Excision-secondary healing and lay open was performed on 30 of the patients admitted with recurrence. Excision and flap closure was applied on 11 patients. Our recurrence rate was 9.7%. The recurrence rate of our study is compatible with the literature. Comparative studies are needed to determine the appropriate method to decrease recurrence rate.

No abstract

The management of iatrogenic bile duct injuries should be carefully planned with a multidisciplinary approach. The predictive factors affecting morbidity and mortality are important in determining the best modality for managing iatrogenic bile duct injuries. Abscess formation, vascular injury, and serum bilirubin level are the potential risk factors. Therefore, we can strongly recommend immediate assessment of patients for prompt diagnosis and referring to an HPB center, to avoid further injuries.