2013
DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00081.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus: Lay Open or Flap Closure, Does It Differ?

Abstract: Treatment options of pilonidal sinus, which has high recurrence rates, is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyze for possible factors affecting recurrence. Forty-one patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus were included in this study. Of them, 33 were male and 9 were female (mean age, 24.9 years; age range, 16-42). Factors (i.e., risk factors) were detected in 32 patients. Excision-secondary healing and lay open was performed on 30 of the patients admitted with recurrence. Excision and flap cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the closed methods, there are different types of wound closure, including midline closure, an off-midline closure or a flap reconstruction. However, none of these techniques are considered optimum in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the closed methods, there are different types of wound closure, including midline closure, an off-midline closure or a flap reconstruction. However, none of these techniques are considered optimum in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its prevalence is 1-4 per 25000 population, with a 40% five-year recurrence rate (1)(2)(3). Approximately 70% of PSD patients are between 20-30 years of age (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional treatment consists of excision and healing by secondary intention. 9 Aydede et al designed a study to compare three methods namely marsupialisation, primary midline closure and skin flaps. No difference in wound infection and recurrence rates was observed between three methods and emphasized that these methods are still useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%