Background/aim: In parallel with increased frequency and higher quality of imaging techniques, the prevalence of adrenal adenoma has gradually increased. However, despite the growing incidence, the metabolic and tumorigenesis processes involved in its etiology are still unclear. Although visfatin has been reported to be associated with inflammation and tumorigenesis, its role in adrenal adenoma has not yet been investigated. Therefore, the present study was performed with an aim to evaluate visfatin levels and cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with adrenal adenoma. Materials and methods: Thirty patients recently diagnosed with adrenal adenoma along with 30 healthy participants were studied in a tertiary healthcare center. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements were performed. Results: The frequencies of diabetes mellitus and hypertension were found to be statistically higher in the adrenal adenoma group. Although the values of mean fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR levels, and the mean, maximum, minimum, delta systolic, and diastolic blood pressures were established to be higher in the adrenal adenoma group, the differences were not found to be statistically significant. Mean high-sensitive C-reactive protein, visfatin levels, and CIMT were seen to be significantly higher in the adenoma group. Conclusion: Cardiometabolic risk factors as well as the visfatin levels were established to be higher in patients with adrenal adenoma. Elevated visfatin levels might play a role in the development and metabolic process of adrenal adenoma.
Backgrounds and Aims In autoimmune hepatitis, there are uncertainties about whether to discontinue the treatment, when the treatment should be discontinued, and the risks of relapse in the cases where remission is achieved with immunosuppressive therapy. In this study, patients with AIH, whose immunosuppressive treatments were discontinued, were evaluated for the rates of remission and the risk of relapse. Materials and Methods A total of 119 patients, who were diagnosed with AIH based on the AIHG scoring systems between 1990 and 2015, were evaluated. Patients were receiving standard azathioprine and steroid therapy. The treatment was discontinued in patients, who had been receiving treatment for at least 2 years, who had no clinical complaints, and whose aminotransferases were normal and when an increase occurred in AST values more than two times the normal after the treatment was interrupted, the case was considered as a relapse. Results Among the patients, 83%( n = 99) were women. When the patients were diagnosed with AIH, their mean age was 36 ± 16(8–79) years; 70.6%( n = 84) were type 1, 3.4%( n = 4) type 2, and 26%( n = 31) were autoantibody-negative AIH. At the time of discontinuation, liver biopsy was performed in 8 of the patients and minimal-mild abnormalities were detected. Patients whose treatment was discontinued received treatment for an average of 101 ± 75(range: 24–280, median: 68.5) months; and, they were followed up for an average of 19 (1–110) months during the period without medication. Relapse occurred in 67%( n = 12) of the patients with drug withdrawal. Relapse occurred within the first 12 months in 67% of these patients ( n = 8) and developed with an acute hepatitis attack in 42%. None of the clinical, laboratory, and histological data were found to be effective on relapse. Conclusion In patients with AIH, relapse occurs in two-thirds of patients within an average of 19 month after the discontinuation of the medication. Most relapses occur at the early period and they are accompanied by an acute hepatitis attack.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.