Recent studies have suggested that allergic fungal rhino-sinusitis could be involved in the development of nasal polyposis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of anti-fungal nasal lavages. Patients performed nasal lavage with 20 ml of a one per one thousand amphotericin B suspension in each nostril, twice a day, for four weeks. In addition, all patients continued their saline nasal lavage and their conventional topical corticosteroid spray. This study included 74 patients, with a mean age of 46 years (range from 19 to 73). Before anti-fungal treatment, the distribution of nasal polyposis, according to Malm, was: 13 patients in stage I (17.5 per cent), 48 patients in stage II (65 per cent) and 13 patients in stage III (17.5 per cent). After anti-fungal nasal lavages, the total disappearance of nasal polyposis was observed in 29 patients (39 per cent). Eight patients were stage I, 21 stage II, and none stage III. In patients who have had previous endoscopic polypectomy and functional endoscopic sinus surgery, total disappearance of nasal polyposis was seen in 24 patients (47 per cent). Hyper-reactivity to fungal organisms could be one of the mechanisms underlying the development of nasal polyposis. A direct effect of amphotericin B suspension on the integrity of the cell membrane of the polyps' epithelium could not be excluded.
Better retronasal than orthonasal olfactory function seems to be associated with the presence of mechanical obstruction in the anterior portion of the olfactory cleft. In turn, these data indicate that olfactory loss in NP seems to be caused by regional mechanical or inflammatory factors.
A minority of patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) have a bacterial infection and may benefit from antibiotherapy. In previous investigations we showed that in patients suffering from acute rhinosinusitis associated with the presence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis in their nasopharygeal secretions, resolution of symptoms was significantly improved by antibiotic treatment. The present analysis was performed to determine whether specific clinical symptoms or signs observed during careful endoscopic examination of the nasal cavities could help the clinician to identify a subset of patients with moderate forms of acute rhinosinusitis infected with pathogenic bacteria. Detailed clinical histories were obtained and medical examinations performed in 265 patients (138 females, 127 males; mean age 35 years) presenting with a < 4-week history of URTI symptoms but who did not require immediate antibiotic therapy for severe rhinosinusitis. The presence of three pathogenic bacteria (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis) was determined in all patients by culture of nasopharyngeal secretions. Azithromycin (500 mg/day for 3 days; n = 133) or placebo (n = 132) were randomly given to all patients in a double-blind manner. Pathogenic bacteria were found in 77 patients (29%). The clinical signs and symptoms significantly associated in a multivariate model with the presence of bacteria included colored nasal discharge (p < 0.003), facial pain (p < 0.032) and radiologically determined maxillary sinusitis (complete opacity, air-fluid level or mucosal thickening > 10 mm) (p < 0.001). This best predictive model had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 64% and therefore could not be used either as a screening tool or as a diagnostic criterion for bacterial rhinosinusitis. In the group of patients with positive bacterial cultures, resolution of symptoms at Day 7 was observed in 73% of patients treated with azithromycin and in 47% of patients in the placebo group (p < 0.007). We conclude that signs and symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis in patients with mild-to-moderate clinical presentations are poor predictors of the presence of bacteria.
The degree of inflammation seems to be a good prognostic indicator regarding CRS recurrence. Long-term outcome after ENS for CRS showed significant improvement in subjective rhinosinusitis-specific symptoms, objective NAR, and rhinosinusitis disability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.