Functional outcome varied substantially after hospitalization for a serious illness. A small amount of readily available clinical information can estimate the probability of severe functional limitations.
Little is known about dental appearance in terms of the elderly population. The purpose of this paper is to compare self-reported dental appearance with dentist-rated appearance for individuals over 65. The subjects (N = 550) were participants in the Los Angeles based Medicare Screening and Health Promotion Trial. Most were female (57.3%), white (89.0%), and married (62.0%), with a mean age of 74.5 years. About one-third had incomes greater than $25,000. Results are based on a 45 minute telephone interview and onsite dental screening. Findings show that 40% of the self-ratings on a five point scale were higher than the dentist ratings, and 22% were lower. Bivariate analyses showed that both sets of ratings were related to dental status variables, self-reported health, and education. High self-ratings were also associated with being white and having a positive mental health status, while high dentist ratings were associated with patients who were younger, married, and who had higher income and social network scores. Comparison of results from two multiple regressions showed unique predictors for the self-ratings (marital status and GOHAI scores) and for the dentist ratings (sex and income). These discrepancies can raise barriers to effective treatment planning in the elderly, which could affect utilization and satisfaction.
Over the past 30 years, an explosion in health care expenditures has occurred. Prior to 1960, health care accounted for 4.4% of the U.S. Gross National Product; today it is 11%. Before rational solutions to controlling this rise can be proposed, we must determine whether the care that we are currently paying for is appropriate to the needs of the elderly. This paper analyzes the literature regarding appropriateness of acute care provided to the elderly. We identified 17 articles that explicitly cited appropriate or inappropriate care (including under-, over- and misuse) provided in hospital and ambulatory settings and for procedures, and 19 articles that presented data on the appropriateness of medication use in the elderly. Virtually every study included in this review found at least double-digit levels of inappropriate care. Perhaps as much as one-fifth to one-quarter of acute hospital services or procedures were felt to be used for equivocal or inappropriate reasons, and two-fifths to one-half of the medications studied were overused in outpatients. The few studies that examined underuse or misuse of services also documented the existence of these phenomena. This was especially true for the ambulatory care of chronic physical and mental conditions and concerned the use of low-cost technologies (visits, preventive services, some medications). Thus, we conclude that there appears to be a substantial problem in the matching of acute services to the needs of elderly patients. This mismatch occurs both in terms of overuse and underuse, at least for areas where research has been conducted.
An episodes of care methodology examines the contiguous cluster of services related to a particular health condition. We developed an episodes methodology for evaluating the quality of health care delivery to privately insured adult asthma patients. Computer algorithms were used for episode construction beginning with an index asthma diagnosis and ending with a final clinical event, yielding a sample of 30,553 episodes. Only service claims with an asthma diagnosis were assigned to an episode. We used a database of private insurance claims from 1992 to 1993. Disease staging served as the framework for evaluating episodes with similar severity and resource use. We found that episodes of care can be constructed from claims data and have the potential for use in physician profiling and as quality screens. Certain limitations in using this methodology suggest that caution needs to be exercised in applying this approach to evaluation of health care services.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.