Considering there is an average of 7.5% normal diurnal variation in canine CCT, a 3.0% difference between Pentacam and SD-OCT values is likely not clinically relevant. However, Pentacam measurements were both statistically and clinically significantly different from UBM and SD-OCT measurements.

Objective To describe and compare normative anterior segment parameters between canine age groups using the Pentacam® HR Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam). Animals Studied Thirty‐six sedated dogs (60 eyes) of varying ages and breeds were imaged with the Pentacam; only nondiseased anterior segments were included. Procedures Dogs were divided into three age groups: Group 1 (1‐5 years), Group 2 (6‐10 years), and Group 3 (11‐15 years). Values assessed included central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior and posterior corneal elevation (ACE/PCE), anterior and posterior corneal curvature metrics, corneal volume (CV), anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism (AA/PA), anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber volume (ACV), and anterior chamber angle (ACA). Tukey‐adjusted pairwise comparisons were performed. Results Overall CCT (mean ± SD) was 631.07 ± 59.91 µm. Central corneal thickness was 608.60 ± 48.63 µm for Group 1, 648.57 ± 51.06 µm for Group 2, and 635.37 ± 73.71 µm for Group 3. Anterior corneal elevation (ACE) measured 9.08 ± 0.58 mm, PCE measured 8.04 ± 0.50 mm, and CV was 58.13 ± 5.39 mm3. Astigmatism values were 1.34 ± 0.94 D for AA and 0.46 ± 0.44 D for PA. Anterior chamber values were 3.76 ± 0.56 mm for ACD, 383.68 ± 66.24 mm3 for ACV, and 23.62 ± 29.33˚ for ACA. Significant differences were found between Groups 1 and 2 for CV (55.08 ± 4.08 mm3 and 60.32 ± 4.19 mm3, respectively), (P = 0.02). Conclusions Corneal volume significantly increased between Group 1 and Group 2. Central corneal thickness increased from Group 1 to Group 3, but was not significant with the current sample size. There were no other differences between age groups.