Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of stomach position grading in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) as proposed by Cordier et al and Basta et al after standardization of the methods at our center. Methods We collected sonographic images from 23 fetuses with left‐sided CDH at our center from 2010 to 2018. Nine operators (one maternal fetal medicine expert and eight sonographers) reviewed the selected images and graded the stomach position according to the methods of Cordier et al and Basta et al. We assessed the interoperator agreement with Fleiss's kappa statistics. Results Overall agreement amongst all operators was moderate for both methods proposed by Cordier et al (k = 0.60, SE 0.07, 95% CI 0.47‐0.73, P < .0001) and Basta et al (k = 0.60, SE 0.06, 95% CI 0.47‐0.73, P < .0001). Interoperator agreement was moderate for grade 3 with the method by Cordier et al (k = 0.45, SE 0.09, 95% CI 0.27‐0.64, P < .0001) and fair for grade 4 with the method by Basta et al (k = 0.33, SE 0.08, 95% CI 0.18‐0.49 P < .0001). Conclusions Our study demonstrates a fair to moderate interoperator agreement of the stomach position grading methods proposed in the literature after standardization of the methods at our center. Further multicenter studies are needed to confirm our results.

ABSTRACT

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of a standardized method to assess the ultrasound liver‐to‐thoracic area ratio in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Methods We selected 24 images of 9 fetuses diagnosed with left‐sided at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. Eight operators (1 maternal‐fetal medicine specialist and 7 sonographers) reviewed the selected images and assessed the ultrasound liver‐to‐thoracic area ratio according to a standardized protocol. We evaluated the correlation between operators using the intraclass correlation coefficient and compared agreement between the sonographers and a physician with experience in measuring the ultrasound liver‐to‐thoracic area ratio using a Bland‐Altman analysis. Results Good intraoperator reproducibility was observed for the standardized ultrasound liver‐to‐thoracic area ratio (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.78). Good agreement among sonographers and the physician was also observed for the standardized measurements (bias, 0.01; precision, 0.03; limits of agreement, –0.05 to + 0.07). Conclusions We demonstrated that good intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility of ultrasound liver‐to‐thoracic area ratio assessment is feasible after standardizing the method in our center.

We demonstrated that the lung-to-head ratio tracing method has high interoperator reproducibility and the best agreement among the operators at our center. Further multicenter studies are necessary to confirm our results.

No abstract