2018
DOI: 10.1002/jum.14557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of Lung‐to‐Head Ratio Ultrasound Measurements in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Abstract: We demonstrated that the lung-to-head ratio tracing method has high interoperator reproducibility and the best agreement among the operators at our center. Further multicenter studies are necessary to confirm our results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of this, several sonographic and MRI tools have been proposed and are an integral part of prenatal CDH work up in most fetal centers. Although sonographic O/E-LHR [3] and LiTR [5] have been shown to be highly reproducible, stomach position only has a fair-to-moderate interoperator reproducibility [13]. In the present study, we evaluated the reproducibility of manually generated lung and liver volume tracings on fetal MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In light of this, several sonographic and MRI tools have been proposed and are an integral part of prenatal CDH work up in most fetal centers. Although sonographic O/E-LHR [3] and LiTR [5] have been shown to be highly reproducible, stomach position only has a fair-to-moderate interoperator reproducibility [13]. In the present study, we evaluated the reproducibility of manually generated lung and liver volume tracings on fetal MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare all reviewers, generalized linear mixed models with random effect were used to assess ICC among reviewers. The reviewer with 20+ years of experience was defined as the expert reviewer for comparisons within the Bland-Altman analysis [3]. We classified the level of reproducibility as excellent, good, moderate, or poor based on the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ICC estimates (>0.9, between 0.75 and 0.9, between 0.5 and 0.75, and <0.5, respectively) [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%