This paper aims to perform a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) on ten TEDx talks in Saudi Arabia. The analysis aims to reveal how linguistic choices shape or are shaped by ideological assumptions and power relations, particularly the use of rhetorical strategies such as rhetorical questions, repetition, figurative speech, religious phrases and pronouns. While previous studies have explored persuasion in TEDx talks in various languages, including Aravind and Rajasekaran (2019), Di Carlo (2015) and Petiy (2017), limited research has focused on persuasion in Arabic TEDx talks. The analysis of the rhetorical strategies used can enhance individuals' awareness of persuasive techniques employed in political discourse, media and other communication contexts. This awareness can facilitate informed decision-making by enabling individuals to critically evaluate messages they receive. The study argues that Islamic ideologies and power relations, as well as ideologies associated with the Saudi 2030 vision, play a significant role in shaping the rhetorical strategies employed in Saudi TEDx talks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.