This study explored the prevalence of expulsion in home-based child care (HBCC) settings using a nationally representative sample of HBCC providers from the National Survey of Early Care and Education. In addition to prevalence, enrollment and provider characteristics that predicted expulsion were examined. Although there is increasing awareness of the prevalence of early childhood suspension and expulsion in early care and education settings and the negative effects it has on children's development, few studies have included or focused on HBCC, where many children receive care. This study highlights that many home-based providers, especially listed providers, report that they expelled at least one child within the last year. Significant predictors of expulsion emerged, including enrollment characteristics such as caring for children with disabilities, enrolling more children, and caring for children unrelated to the provider. Provider characteristics, including years of experience, provider education, and provider age, also predicted provider report of expulsion. These results provide insight as to possible strategies that may be effective in reducing expulsion rates in this caregiving context. K E Y W O R D Schallenging behavior, early childhood education, expulsion, family child care, home-based child care RESUMENEste estudio exploró la prevalencia de expulsión en escenarios de cuidado infantil con base en el hogar usando una muestra nacionalmente representativa de proveedores de cuidado infantil con base en el hogar de la Encuesta Nacional de Cuidado y Educación Temprana. Además de la prevalencia, se examinaron el número de inscripciones y las características del proveedor que predecían la expulsión. A pesar de que aumenta el conocimiento acerca de la prevalencia de la suspensión y expulsión en la temprana niñez en escenarios de cuidado y educación temprana y de los efectos negativos que la misma tiene en el desarrollo de los niños, pocos estudios han incluido o se han enfocado en el cuidado infantil con base en el hogar, donde muchos niños reciben el cuidado. Este estudio subraya el hecho de que muchos proveedores con base en el hogar, especialmente proveedores que son parte de una lista, reportan que ellos expulsaron por lo menos un niño dentro del último año. Surgieron significativos factores de predicción de la expulsión, incluyendo características de la inscripción tales como el cuidar a niños con discapacidades, el inscribir a más niños y el cuidar a niños que no están relacionados con el proveedor. Las características del proveedor, incluyendo los años de experiencia, la educación del proveedor y la edad del proveedor, Infant Ment Health J. 2020;41:411-425.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

This research uses focus group methodology to examine how a specific subset of family childcare providers—those participating in a voluntary quality rating and improvement system and serving a high percentage of children receiving childcare subsidy—define quality. The study builds on the limited existing research about family childcare quality, especially research focused on understanding quality from the perspective of the childcare provider. A total of 28 family childcare providers participated in three focus groups where they were asked to define quality and to describe high- and low-quality programs. Qualitative analysis revealed four themes: relationships, supporting children’s learning, the physical and temporal environment, and personal professionalism. These results can inform how quality improvement initiatives and professional development systems support and engage family childcare providers.

This study examined profiles of family functioning, stress, psychological well-being, and social support in families participating in early head start; family characteristics that relate to profile membership; and the relationship of profiles to child social–emotional functioning. Because families’ levels of functioning and well-being vary widely within low-income samples, we used a person-centered approach to understand how variations among families are linked with children’s social–emotional skills. Our latent profile analysis of a sample of 246 families identified three profiles of family functioning and well-being: low stress, high family functioning (63%); moderate family stress, low family functioning (25%); and high psychological distress and parenting stress (12%). Children’s social–emotional functioning, both social competence and problem behavior, related to profile membership. Children in the low stress, high family functioning profile displayed the most optimal social–emotional skills. These results highlight the importance of supporting family functioning and decreasing family stress to influence young children’s positive behaviors.

No abstract

No abstract