Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are some of the most difficult ecosystem services (ES) to characterize and connect to specific ecosystem processes. Given their connections to human emotion, deep meaning, fulfilment and motivation, they are also crucial for human well‐being.
Scholars have published hundreds of peer‐reviewed articles addressing CES in myriad ways. In this systematic review, we analyse 232 peer‐reviewed articles on CES and examine how these studies discuss the interaction between CES research and decision‐making.
We describe the primary ways that scholars have addressed the relationship between CES and decision‐making, and we characterize each study with respect to how thoroughly its authors attend to the possible applications of their results. We find that 27% of papers discuss connections to decision‐making in general terms, 28% discuss specific connections to decision‐making, and the remainder mention decision‐making links briefly or not at all.
We also discuss patterns based on the particular CES studied (e.g. recreation, identity); methods used; change through time; and geographical location of authors and of study sites.
We end with reflections on the current state of the interface between CES (and related concepts for approaching the non‐material values associated with ecosystems) and decision‐making, and we discuss future steps to increase connections between CES and decision‐making.
A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
Forest soils are often deep and/or coarse‐textured, which does not always lend itself to easy unbiased sampling. Two important Pacific Northwest (PNW) forest soil series that are deep and coarse‐textured were studied to evaluate methods of estimating soil C: (i) a loamy sand glacial outwash soil (Indianola series, mixed, mesic Dystric Xeropsamments) and (ii) a very gravelly sandy loam glacial outwash soil (Everett series, sandy‐skeletal, isotic, mesic Vitrandic Dystroxerepts). Four methods were compared for estimating soil C, including: (i) large pit (0.5 m2) excavation, (ii) dug pit with 54‐mm hammer‐core bulk‐density sampling, (iii) 31‐mm soil push sampler, and (iv) clod method. Coarse (>2 mm) fragments were also collected, processed, and analyzed for soil C. Extending soil sampling deeper than 15 cm increased soil C estimates by as much as 120%. The pit excavation method with sand‐displacement volume measurements, which is by far the most labor‐intensive and time‐consuming, was considered the “standard” by which other methods were compared, as it didn't contain any obvious biases. Soil core methods overestimated the <2‐mm soil fraction (samples taken between large rocks). Biased methods are often accepted as the “best available” due to the high time requirement of pit excavation. The 31‐ or 54‐mm soil core methods often didn't work due to the high rock content (>50%) of the Everett soil. Including C analysis of the >2‐mm soil fraction increased soil C estimates by 170% for the Everett series soil (due to organic C contained in the rocks; there were no carbonates) but did not substantially increase the estimate in the Indianola series soil.
Maintaining steady growth remains the central goal of economic policy in most nations. However, as evidenced by the advent of the Anthropocene, the global economy has expanded to a point where limits to growth are appearing. Facing the end of growth requires a careful re-examination of plausible future conditions. We draw on a diverse literature to present an interdisciplinary exploration of post-growth conditions in the areas of climate change, ecological impacts, governance, and education, finding that such conditions may invalidate many prevalent assumptions regarding the future. The post-growth world, while subject to significant uncertainty and heterogeneity, will be characterized by profound hazards and discontinuities for both human and natural systems. Furthermore, we argue that an economic paradigm change will be predicated on an involuntary and unplanned cessation of growth. This implies a necessary strategic expansion of the heterodox economic discourse to formulate appropriate responses in view of likely post-growth realities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.