patients with 71 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures were prospectively examined after an operative treatment using an extended lateral approach and the ASIF calcaneal plate followed by early functional postoperative treatment (mean follow-up 25 months, retrieval rate 96 %). To classify the type of fracture and to verify the results of reduction and of retention CT scans in the coronal and transverse plane were performed pre-and postoperatively and on the day of assessment. The Zwipp Score was used for clinical evaluation. After fractures with 5 to 8 points according to the calcaneal fracture scale, 97 % of the patients had an anatomical or near anatomical reduction of the posterior facet and the clinical outcome in 82 % of the patients was graded as good or excellent. In 70 % of patients with a fracture rated 9 to 10 points a good reduction was demonstrated and clinically there were 67 % good or excellent results. But in the fractures with 11 to 12 points, despite 40 % good reductions, the clinical outcome was graded as good in 10 % of the patients only. However, if the postoperative displacement of the posterior facet was more than 2 mm no patient had a good result independent of the type of fracture. Due to restoration of the geometry of the most comminuted fracture types and the immediate partial weight bearing secondary soft tissue problems could be minimized without any loss of articular reduction. Anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation together with adequate physical therapy are apparently preconditions but not a guarantee for a good clinical result after displaced calcaneal fractures.
Subtalar joint arthroscopy for reconfirmation of the correct diagnosis conjoined with restoration of physiological hindfoot alignment and a preferably anatomical ligamentous reconstruction provide the basis for a good functional recovery.
This article presents a case of implant failure resulting in mechanical instability of a scaphotrapezotrapezoideal arthrodesis using magnesium-based headless bone screws. During revision surgery osteolysis surrounding the screws was observed as well as degraded screw threads already in existence at 6 weeks after implantation. The supposed osseous integration attributed to magnesium-based screws could not be reproduced in this particular case. Thus, it can be reasoned that the use of magnesium-based screws for partial wrist arthrodesis cannot be encouraged, at least not in dual use.
BackgroundThis study aimed to determine whether sex, hand length and the individual training status affect hand strength and whether these measurements differ if they are recorded using the Jamar dynamometer or a new cylindrical measuring system.MethodsFor this purpose, 152 healthy adults were examined using a new manugraphy measuring system (novel, Munich, Germany) comprising two measuring cylinders of different sizes and a Jamar electronic dynamometer with two grip positions corresponding approximately to the sizes of the cylinders. A descriptive analysis was performed as well as a correlation analysis using the Pearson correlation coefficient. To prepare predictive models, multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to determine factors that influence the force and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA significant difference in the maximum and mean strength was observed that is dependent on sex, with men stronger than women, in line with expectations, and hand length, with small hands able to exert less force than large hands. No consistent increase in strength could be attributed to repetitive manual loads applied either at work or in leisure activities.ConclusionsBoth measurement techniques yielded similar results, suggesting that manugraphy is well suited for clinical research purposes because it not only takes measurements that are just as reproducible and valid as the conventional measurement technique but in doing so measures not just the total strength of a hand but also enables more precise comparisons of isolated hand regions applying dynamic measurements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.