Background: When evaluating a pediatric patient with abdominal pain, identification of a small-bowel to small-bowel intussusception (SBI) on radiologic imaging can create a diagnostic dilemma. The clinical significance and need for surgical exploration of SBI is highly variable, as most of them are considered clinically insignificant. We hypothesize that combination of clinical and radiologic factors in an exclusively SBI population will yield factors that guide the clinician in making operative decisions. Methods: A comprehensive database from a pediatric tertiary hospital was reviewed from 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2016 for any radiographic study mentioning intussusception. Results were reviewed for patients having only SBI (i.e. not ileo-colic intussusception) and this comprised the study cohort. The electronic medical records for these patients were reviewed for clinical presentation variables, need for operative intervention, and identification of the intussusception during surgery. Patients with SBI due to enteral feeding tubes were excluded from the study. Results: Within the study period, 139 patients were identified with a small-bowel intussusception (SBI) on radiologic imaging. Univariate analysis yielded numerous clinical and radiologic factors highly predictive for need for surgical intervention. However upon multivariate analysis, only a history of prior

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Breast cancer can affect anyone; therefore, it affects people of all gender identities. Reconstructive options after breast cancer must then address the needs of all people. Our institution is unique in its provision of both high-level comprehensive breast and gender affirmation care. In our practice, patients have expressed gender diverse identities during their breast cancer reconstructive journey. In these cases, goals have deviated from traditional breast restoration, gravitating toward gender-affirming mastectomy, or results often seen with "top surgery." We present a framework for the administration of breast cancer care and discussions of reconstruction from a lens of gender inclusivity. Breast cancer is a diagnosis that has been gendered, resulting in the erasure and exclusion of reconstructive needs for people affected by breast cancer that are not cisgender women. This is illustrated through the case of a nonbinary individual seen in breast cancer clinic for multifocal ductal carcinoma in situ. Our standard review of options of "going flat," implant-based reconstruction, and autologous reconstruction led to initial confusion given their early exploration of gender identity co-occurring with a new diagnosis of breast cancer. These scenarios can be challenging when viewed solely from the perspective of a breast reconstructive surgeon or a gender-affirming surgeon alone. Both perspectives are often needed. Our gender-affirming and breast reconstructive teams have discussed methods to identify patients who require more robust discussion of gender identity and reconstructive options in the setting of breast cancer, such as chest masculinization. By adding gender-affirming surgeons to the list of providers available to counsel breast cancer patients, we may be able to better provide early education on all reconstructive options and appropriately address the needs of transgender and gender diverse people affected by breast cancer.