The CIP 10-M personal sampler measures worker exposure to airborne particles by collecting particles in a rotating metal cup containing a few milliliters of a collection fluid. This device is mainly used to sample microorganisms or microbial components to measure bioaerosol concentrations in various occupational environments. Aqueous liquids are generally used, but their rapid evaporation limits the duration of sampling; alternative collection fluids could alleviate this problem. Indeed, the particle-collection efficiency of the rotating cup has not been extensively studied, and the only data available relate to a discontinued model. This study aimed to measure the collection efficiency of the current rotating cup model containing an aqueous (water) or viscous (ViaTrap mineral oil) collection fluid. The kinetics of evaporation confirmed that ViaTrap does not evaporate, making 8-h sampling campaigns in constant volumes feasible. Particles with a wide range of aerodynamic diameters (between around 0.1 and 10 mm) were produced using various test rigs and mono-or polydisperse test aerosols. Both new and older cup models performed similarly, with a collection efficiency of >80% for larger particles (aerodynamic diameters >2.8 mm), progressively decreasing to around 50% for aerodynamic diameters of 2.1 mm; with aerodynamic diameters of <1 mm, the collection efficiency was generally <10%. In physical terms, collection efficiency was unaffected by the type (aqueous or viscous) or volume (between 0 and 3 mL) of collection fluid used. Bias maps indicated that the inhalable fraction may be underestimated in occupational settings, particularly with aerosols mainly composed of particles with aerodynamic diameters of less than around 3 mm. EDITORTiina Reponen

Measurement of worker exposure to a thoracic health-related aerosol fraction is necessary in a number of occupational situations. This is the case of workplaces with atmospheres polluted by fibrous particles, such as cotton dust or asbestos, and by particles inducing irritation or bronchoconstriction such as acid mists or flour dust. Three personal and two static thoracic aerosol samplers were tested under laboratory conditions. Sampling efficiency with respect to particle aerodynamic diameter was measured in a horizontal low wind tunnel and in a vertical calm air chamber. Sampling performance was evaluated against conventional thoracic penetration. Three of the tested samplers performed well, when sampling the thoracic aerosol at nominal flow rate and two others performed well at optimized flow rate. The limit of flow rate optimization was found when using cyclone samplers.

No abstract

The CIP 10 is a personal aerosol sampler designed to sample conventional dust or specific occupational inorganic or organic substances such as crystalline silica, isocyanates or mycotoxins. It is widespread used, especially in France. Within the CIP10, the rotating cup contains a porous polyurethane foam devoted to the collection of airborne particles and rotates inside its housing at a speed close to 6700 rpm to induce a 7 or 10 L/min sampling airflow, depending on the particle-size selector. Despite several published works regarding its physical performances, no experimental data exist regarding the sampling efficiency for submicron particles. This study aimed to measure the collection efficiency of the CIP 10 for different types of foam (60 or 75 ppi, functionalized or not) and for the three selectors (inhalable, thoracic, respirable). Polydisperse particles with aerodynamic diameters between 20 nm and 10 µm were produced using various generators and different materials (DEHS, glass beads) in a specific test rig. For a given diameter, the collection efficiency was calculated by comparing the number concentrations measured alternatively upstream and downstream of the rotating cup, using APS (TSI 3321) or SMPS (Grimm DMA Vienna Type, CPC 5.403) spectrometers. While collection efficiency was 100% for particles &gt; 3 µm, it progressively decreased to around 50 % and even below 10 % for aerodynamic diameters of 800 mm and 150 nm, respectively. Collection efficiency was unaffected by the type of foam or sampler flow rate used. Bias maps and consequences on workers aerosol exposure assessment will be discussed.