BACKGROUND Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an adjuvant treatment for intracranial lesions that are treatment refractory or in deep or eloquent brain. Initial studies of LITT in surgical neuro-oncology are limited in size and follow-up. OBJECTIVE To present our series of LITT in surgical neuro-oncology to better evaluate procedural safety and outcomes. METHODS An exploratory cohort study of all patients receiving LITT for brain tumors by a single senior neurosurgeon at a single center between 2013 and 2018. Primary outcomes included extent of ablation (EOA), time to recurrence (TTR), local control at 1-yr follow-up, and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included complication rate. Outcomes were compared by tumor subtype. Predictors of outcomes were identified. RESULTS A total of 91 patients underwent 100 LITT procedures; 61% remain alive with 72% local control at median 7.2 mo follow-up. Median TTR and OS were 31.9 and 16.9 mo, respectively. For lesion subtypes, median TTR (months, not applicable [N/A] if <50% rate observed), local control rates at 1-yr follow-up, and median OS (months) were the following: dural-based lesions (n = 4, N/A, 75%, 20.7), metastases (n = 45, 55.9, 77.4%, 16.9), newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 11, 31.9, 83.3%, 32.3), recurrent glioblastoma (n = 14, 5.6, 24.3%, 7.3), radiation necrosis (n = 20, N/A, 67.2%, 16.4), and other lesions (n = 6, 12.3, 80%, 24.4). TTR differed by tumor subtype (P = .02, log-rank analysis). EOA predicted local control (P = .009, multivariate proportional hazards regression); EOA > 85% predicted longer TTR (P = .006, log-rank analysis). Complication rate was 4%. CONCLUSION Our series of LITT in surgical neuro-oncology, 1 of the largest to date, further evidences its safety and outcomes profile.

Background Because less-invasive techniques can obviate the need for brain biopsy in the diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), it is common practice to wait for a thorough initial work-up, which may delay treatment. We conducted a systematic review and reviewed our own series of patients to define the role of LP and early brain biopsy in the diagnosis of PCNSL. Methods Our study was divided into 2 main sections: 1) systematic review assessing the sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis on the diagnosis of PCNSL, and 2) a retrospective, single-center patient series assessing the diagnostic accuracy and safety of early biopsy in immunocompetent PCNSL patients treated at our institution from 2012 to 2018. Results Our systematic review identified 1481 patients with PCNSL. A preoperative LP obviated surgery in 7.4% of cases. Brain biopsy was the preferred method of diagnosis in 95% of patients followed by CSF (3.1%). In our institutional series, brain biopsy was diagnostic in 92.3% of cases (24/26) with 2 cases that required a second procedure for diagnosis. Perioperative morbidity was noted in 7.6% of cases (n = 2) due to hemorrhages after stereotactic brain biopsy that improved at follow-up. Conclusions The diagnostic yield of CSF analyses for PCNSL in immunocompetent patients remains exceedingly low. Our institutional series demonstrates that early biopsy for PCNSL is safe and accurate, and may avert protracted work-ups. We conclude that performing an early brain biopsy in a suspected case of PCNSL is a valid, safe option to minimize diagnostic delay.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background Large-scale brain networks and higher cognitive functions are frequently altered in neuro-oncology patients, but comprehensive non-invasive brain mapping is difficult to achieve in the clinical setting. The objective of our study is to evaluate traditional and non-traditional eloquent areas in brain tumor patients using a machine learning platform. Methods We retrospectively included patients who underwent surgery for brain tumor resection at our Institution. Preoperative MRI with T1-weighted and DTI sequences were uploaded into the Quicktome platform. We categorized the integrity of nine large-scale brain networks: language, sensorimotor, visual, ventral attention, central executive, default mode, dorsal attention, salience and limbic. Network integrity was correlated with preoperative clinical data. Results One-hundred patients were included in the study. The most affected network was the central executive network (49%), followed by the default mode network (43%) and dorsal attention network (32%). Patients with preoperative deficits showed a significantly higher number of altered networks before the surgery (3.42 vs 2.19, p<.001), compared to patients without deficits. Furthermore, we found that patients without neurologic deficits had an average 2.19 networks affected and 1.51 networks at risk, with most of them being related to non-traditional eloquent areas (p<.001). Conclusion Our results show that large-scale brain networks are frequently affected in patients with brain tumors, even when presenting without evident neurologic deficits. In our study, the most commonly affected brain networks were related to non-traditional eloquent areas. Integrating non-invasive brain mapping machine-learning techniques into the clinical setting may help elucidate how to preserve higher-order cognitive functions associated with those networks.

BACKGROUND Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for posterior fossa lesions remains rare as the small size of the infratentorial compartment, proximity to the brainstem, and thickness/angulation of the occipital bone creates barriers to procedural success. Furthermore, evaluation of the effect of ablation volume on outcomes is limited. OBJECTIVE To analyze our institutional experience with LITT in the posterior fossa stratifying perioperative and long-term outcomes by ablation volumes. METHODS Seventeen patients with posterior fossa lesions treated with LITT from 2013 to 2020 were identified. Local progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, steroid dependence, and edema reduction were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis grouped by ablation volume. Preoperative, postoperative, and last known Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were compared using a matched paired t test. RESULTS No differences in pathology, preoperative KPS, or preoperative lesion volume were found between patients with total (100%-200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) versus radical (>200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) ablations. Patients who underwent radical ablation had a higher postoperative KPS (93 vs 82, P = .02) and higher KPS (94 vs 87, P = .04) and greater reduction in perilesional edema at last follow-up (P = .01). Median follow-up was 80.8 wk. CONCLUSION Despite obvious anatomical challenges, our results demonstrate that radical ablations are both feasible and safe in the posterior fossa. Furthermore, radical ablations may lead to greater decreases in perilesional edema and improved functional status both immediately after surgery and at last follow-up. Thus, LITT should be considered for patients with otherwise unresectable or radioresistant posterior fossa lesions.

Purpose Outpatient brain surgery has many advantages for the psychological and physical wellbeing of patients, as well as reduced costs to the health care system. Compared with inpatient admissions, same day discharges reduce patient exposure to nosocomial infection, thromboembolic complications, and medical error. We aim to establish a prospectively collected quality outcomes database to examine the outcomes of patients that undergo brain tumor resection and are discharged home the same day as surgery. Methods We have established a prospectively collected quality outcomes database to examine the outcomes of all patients that underwent brain tumor resection by a single neurosurgeon (R.J.K) at our institution from August 2020 to August 2021 and were discharged home the same day as surgery. Results Over the one-year period this study was conducted, 37 of 334 patients met inclusion criteria for the outpatient protocol. Thirty-two patients were discharged on the same day as surgery. Five patients (14%) were considered eligible for outpatient surgery but were ultimately admitted to the hospital postoperatively and were discharged after an overnight observation. No postoperative complications were noted at two-week postoperative follow-up. Conclusion In select patients undergoing brain tumor surgery, same day discharge should be considered. Establishing a multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, radiologists, and physical therapists is critical to achieving this aim. Physicians should have a low threshold to admit a patient with concerning exam findings, complications, or complicated past medical history. Once discharged, open communication with the patient and their family is critical to detect complications that should trigger rehospitalization and intervention.