2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03863-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosticating survival of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) by grade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A more contemporary review of 103 PPTID patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) found that surgery with GTR was the only treatment-related prognostic factor, with chemotherapy and RT having no impact on survival. 5 However, the authors of the review do acknowledge that the use of RT should not be ruled out given newer evidence showing an impact on progression-free survival (PFS). 5 Interestingly, the authors also presented 3 patients that had been treated at their institution with adjuvant RT (2 with STR and 1 with GTR), and all 3 were alive without recurrence with follow-up times ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 years.…”
Section: Literature Review/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more contemporary review of 103 PPTID patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) found that surgery with GTR was the only treatment-related prognostic factor, with chemotherapy and RT having no impact on survival. 5 However, the authors of the review do acknowledge that the use of RT should not be ruled out given newer evidence showing an impact on progression-free survival (PFS). 5 Interestingly, the authors also presented 3 patients that had been treated at their institution with adjuvant RT (2 with STR and 1 with GTR), and all 3 were alive without recurrence with follow-up times ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 years.…”
Section: Literature Review/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 However, the authors of the review do acknowledge that the use of RT should not be ruled out given newer evidence showing an impact on progression-free survival (PFS). 5 Interestingly, the authors also presented 3 patients that had been treated at their institution with adjuvant RT (2 with STR and 1 with GTR), and all 3 were alive without recurrence with follow-up times ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 years. 5 Contrary to the previous works, in 1 of the largest metanalyses heretofore conducted incorporating 29 studies and 127 PPTID patients, Mallick et al found that adjuvant RT significantly improved overall survival (OS) to 252 months compared to 168 months for patients who underwent surgery alone.…”
Section: Literature Review/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPTIDs present a challenging diagnosis due to the absence of stringent histopathologic criteria for their classification and the presence of histological features spanning from well-differentiated PCs to high-grade PBs [ 7 , 10 ]. PPTID accounts for nearly 40–45% of all primary parenchymal pineal tumors.…”
Section: Pathological and Molecular Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KBTBD4 in-frame insertion is a frequent molecular alteration in PPTID. In contrast, DICER1 and DROSHA mutations were limited to PBs and may aid in differential diagnosis [ 7 , 13 ]. ATRX mutations associated with protein loss have also been reported [ 14 ].…”
Section: Pathological and Molecular Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation