Aims:  To compare the bacterial diversity of two different ecological regions including human forehead, human forearm and to estimate the influence of make‐up. Methods and Results:  Twenty‐two swab‐scraped skin samples were analysed by profiling bacterial 16S rRNA genes using PCR‐based sequencing of randomly selected clones. Of the 1056 clones analysed, 67 genera and 133 species‐level operational taxonomic units (SLOTUs) belonging to eight phyla were identified. A core set of bacterial taxa was found in all samples, including Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, but pronounced intra‐ and interpersonal variation in bacterial community composition was observed. Only 4·48% of the genera and 1·50% of the SLOTUs were found in all 11 subjects. In contrast to the highly diverse microbiota of the forearm skin, the forehead skin microbiota represented a small‐scale ecosystem with a few genera found in all individuals. The use of make‐up, including foundation and powder, significantly enlarged the community diversity on the forehead skin. Conclusions:  Our study confirmed the presence of a highly diverse microbiota of the human skin as described recently. In contrast to forearm skin, gender does not seem to have much influence on the microbial community of the forehead skin. However, the use of make‐up was associated with a remarkable increase in the bacterial diversity. Significance and Impact of the Study:  This study enhances our knowledge about the highly complex microbiota of the human skin and demonstrates for the first time the significant effect of make‐up on the bacterial diversity of the forehead skin.

Posttranslational core histone acetylation is established and maintained by histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases. Both have been identified as important transcriptional regulators in various eukaryotic systems. In contrast to nonplant systems where only RPD3-related histone deacetylases (HD) have been characterized so far, maize embryos contain three unrelated families of deacetylases (HD1A, HD1B, and HD2). Purification, cDNA cloning, and immunological studies identified the two maize histone deacetylase HD1B forms as close homologues of the RPD3-type deacetylase HDAC1. Unlike the other maize deacetylases, HD1A and nucleolar HD2, HD1B copurified as a complex with a protein related to the retinoblastoma-associated protein, Rbap46. Two HD1B mRNA species could be detected on RNA blots, encoding proteins of 58 kDa (HD1B-I) and 51 kDa (HD1B-II). HD1B-I (zmRpd3) represents the major enzyme form as judged from RNA and immunoblots. Levels of expression of HD1B-I and -II mRNA differ during early embryo germination; HD1B-I mRNA and protein are present during the entire germination pathway, even in the quiescent embryo, whereas HD1B-II expression starts when meristematic cells enter S-phase of the cell cycle. In line with previous results, HD1B exists as soluble and chromatin-bound enzyme forms. In vivo treatment of meristematic tissue with the deacetylase inhibitor HC toxin does not affect the expression of the three maize histone deacetylases, whereas it causes downregulation of histone acetyltransferase B.

We analyzed the expression profile and cellular localization of the maize (Zea mays) Rpd3-type histone deacetylases genes ZmRpd3/101, ZmRpd3/102, and ZmRpd3/108 (indicated as ZmHDA101, ZmHDA102, and ZmHDA108 in the Plant Chromatin Database). This study shows that maize Rpd3 transcripts are present in all the organs and cellular domains analyzed, but we found that their amounts change during development, accumulating in the inner region of the endosperm, in vascular zones of the nucellus, in the tapetum, and in the tetrads. A similar expression profile and nucleus-cytoplasmic localization was observed for ZmRpd3 proteins. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays show that ZmRpd3 proteins can interact with the maize retinoblastoma-related (ZmRBR1) protein, an important regulator of cell cycle progression, and with the maize retinoblastoma-associated protein (ZmRbAp1). However, the three ZmRpd3 proteins do not mutually compete in the binding. These results suggest a general role of ZmRpd3 genes in the plant cell cycle and development. These observations also provide indications on possible mechanisms regulating their transcription and protein accumulation. Similarities in the gene expression profiles and protein interactions may indicate that functional redundancy among members of the ZmRpd3 gene family exists. However, a degree of functional divergence is also supported by our findings.Plant development is a striking example of a highly orchestrated biological process. Recent advances demonstrate that this intricate process is accomplished by diverse mechanisms and networks that operate at distinct levels within the nucleus (Goodrich and Tweedie, 2002). A fundamental mechanism controlling the selectivity of gene expression is the ability of many transcription factors to access the genome of eukaryotes (Struhl, 1999). This is achieved by packaging genes into chromatin, which impedes the binding of any proteins to their target DNA sequences. The accessibility of DNA to protein interaction is regulated by different enzymatic complexes that modulate nucleosomal structure. In the past few years, it has been shown that posttranslational modifications of histones, including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination play a key role in modulating dynamic changes in chromatin structure and gene activity (Wu and Grunstein, 2000). Distinct histone modification patterns, together with direct modifications of the DNA, such as DNA methylation, are believed to form an epigenetic code acting as epigenetic marks or docking elements specifically read by regulatory factors that, in turn, can alter chromatin structure and regulate transcription (Strahl and Allis, 2000;Schreiber and Bernstein, 2002;Turner, 2002).Histone acetylation is the best-characterized type of histone modification (Cress and Seto, 2000;Roth et al., 2001). The enzymes responsible for maintaining the steady-state balance of histone acetylation are the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Both enzymes are members o...