(1) Pectoral ICD implantation using conscious sedation is well tolerated. (2) Postoperative discomfort correlates with longer procedural times and larger intraoperative narcotic requirements.
Introduction: Procedural atrial fibrillation (AF) termination is considered as a predictor of long-term success after catheter ablation for persistent AF (persAF).However, some patients remain free of arrhythmia recurrences despite failure to achieve AF termination. The objective of this study was to assess long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing complex ablation without procedural AF termination.Methods and Results: This study comprised 419 patients (63.8 ± 10.2 years, 63.4% male) undergoing complex ablation for persAF. Patients without procedural AF termination (n = 137, 64.2 ± 9.7 years, 63.5% male) were categorized into patients who remained in sinus rhythm (SR) in long-term outcome (SR-group) and patients with recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) (AR-group). During a follow-up (FU) of 19.6 ± 14.6 months, the SR-group consisted of 65 (47.5%) and the AR-group of 69 (50.4%) patients. Three patients (2.2%) were lost to FU. Left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity and left atrium volume index (LAVI) could be identified as predictors for long-term success. LAA flow velocity and baseline AF cycle length (AFCL) were significantly associated with the type of arrhythmia recurrence (AF vs AT), ie, higher values of both are predictive for AT rather than AF recurrences. Patients with a LAVI < 34.4 mL/m² and significant AFCL increase during the ablation procedure had rather AT than AF recurrences.
Conclusion:Patients with an arrhythmia-free outcome despite failure of procedural AF termination during complex ablation for persAF are characterized by specific morphological and functional properties that are easy to obtain. K E Y W O R D S ablation, atrial fibrillation, cycle length, left atrial appendage flow velocity, left atrial dilatation, predictors, termination
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.