No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundModels of time perception share an element of scalar expectancy theory known as the internal clock, containing specific mechanisms by which the brain is able to experience time passing and function effectively. A debate exists about whether to treat factors that influence these internal clock mechanisms (e.g., emotion, personality, executive functions, and related neurophysiological components) as arousal- or attentional-based factors.PurposeThis study investigated behavioral and neurophysiological responses to an affective time perception Go/NoGo task, taking into account the behavioral inhibition (BIS) and behavioral activation systems (BASs), which are components of reinforcement sensitivity theory.MethodsAfter completion of self-report inventories assessing personality traits, electroencephalogram (EEG/ERP) and behavioral recordings of 32 women and 13 men recruited from introductory psychology classes were completed during an affective time perception Go/NoGo task. This task required participants to respond (Go) and inhibit (NoGo) to positive and negative affective visual stimuli of various durations in comparison to a standard duration.ResultsHigher BAS scores (especially BAS Drive) were associated with overestimation bias scores for positive stimuli, while BIS scores were not correlated with overestimation bias scores. Furthermore, higher BIS Total scores were associated with higher N2d amplitudes during positive stimulus presentation for 280 ms, while higher BAS Total scores were associated with higher N2d amplitudes during negative stimuli presentation for 910 ms.DiscussionFindings are discussed in terms of arousal-based models of time perception, and suggestions for future research are considered.

No abstract

Introduction Poor sleep quality has adverse effects ranging from decreased focus to increased work-related injuries. The Perceptual Vigilance Task (PVT), a measure of reaction time (RT) used to assess alertness is commonly used in sleep research. This study focuses on the relationship between dysfunctional sleep-related cognitions (Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep Scale [DBAS]), insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]), and sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) and their association to PVT RT. Methods 162 participants were recruited from East Carolina University. Inclusion criteria: right-handed adults; exclusion criteria: history of brain injury, seizure disorder, or vision impairment. Age range 18–39 (M = 20.15; SD = 3.01); 81 (49.1%) females. Results ISI was correlated with PVT RT for inter-stimulus interval delay times of 1000ms r(162) = .155, p =.05, 2000ms r(162) = .204, p = .009, 5000ms r(162) =.164, p = .04, and 6000ms r(162) = .181, p = .02. DBAS was correlated with PVT RT for delay times of 2000ms r(162) = .204, p =.021, 3000ms r(162) = .160, p = .04, 4000ms r(162) = .170, p = .03, 6000ms r(162) = .171, p = .030, 7000ms r(162) = .219, p =.005, and 8000ms r(162) = .158 p = .045. ESS was not correlated with PVT. A regression was calculated to predict reaction time at 7000ms delay based on the DBAS (F(1,151) = 2.51, p = .01), with an R2 of .12. Conclusion There is a diminishing association found between insomnia severity and RT during inter-stimulus delay times (>6000ms). Dysfunctional beliefs about sleep correlate with RT through 8000ms delay, eventually predicting RT. Regardless of severity of sleep disturbance, sleep-related bias may affect subjective feelings of wakefulness and objective levels of alertness (e.g., one who believes they are not obtaining sufficient sleep may act accordingly). Support N/A