B EFORE setting out on the direct and noble march to the Court's conclusion in the Segregation Cases,' Chief Justice Warren took care to post a rear guard. The history of the adoption of the fourteenth amendment, to which reargument in these cases had been largely addressed, though casting some light, was, the Chief Justice said, "inconclusive" at best. "The most avid proponents of the postWar Amendments undoubtedly intended them to remove all legal distinctions among 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States.' Their opponents, just as certainly, were antagonistic to both the letter and the spirit of the Amendments and wished them to have the most limited effect. What others in Congress and the state legislatures had in mind cannot be determined with any degree of certainty." 2 Three pages later, as befits a commander in mid-advance, the Chief Justice, having made his dispositions, had no further thought for the rear: "In approaching this problem, we cannot turn the clock back to i868 when the Amendment was adopted, or even to i896 when Plessy v. Ferguson was written. We must consider public education in the light of its full development and its present place in American life throughout the Nation. Only in this way can it I The writer was one of two law clerks to Mr. Justice Frankfurter during the October Term, 1952. At that term, the Court heard the first argument in the Segregation Cases and handed down the order for reargument; the cases were reargued and decided at the following term. The writer's interest in pursuing an investigation into the original understanding of the fourteenth amendment was prompted by the events which took place during his service at the Court.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.