Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers serve as a unique training environment for US residency programs. In this study, we aim to explore the scope and details of VA integration into neurosurgery resident training. We used data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education database to provide an overview of neurosurgery training programs with an active VA affiliation and developed a multi-institutional survey to gather information related to rotation design, operative volume, expectations, and core training values. Of the 116 neurosurgery residency programs, 40 have an active affiliation with a VA medical center (34%). Residents most frequently rotated at the VA during their third postgraduate year, with an average rotation length of 7.5 months (range 2-21). Nearly all programs reported a weekly mix of clinic and operative days (96%), with residents longitudinally following patients throughout their rotations. Attending neurosurgeons from VA-affiliated programs reported operative experience (100%), independent decision-making (89%), and continuity of care (81%) as core values of VA neurosurgery rotations. Surgical volume varied between programs with an average of 13.4 ± 6.4 (SD) cases per month per rotating resident. A significant portion of neurosurgery residency programs in the United States incorporate VA rotations into resident training. Although rotation details vary from program-to-program, shared values include a strong operative experience, independent decision-making, and continuity of care. This analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of VA rotation structure across the country, which is valuable for programs considering implementing a VA rotation into their training program or modifying an existing rotation.
ore than 9 million burn injuries annually are severe enough to require medical attention. The World Health Organization burn mortality estimates have been as high as 180,000 annually. 1,2 Burn incidence surpasses that of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis or human immunodeficiency virus infection. 3 Although the global burden of disease attributable to burns is significant, it is disproportionately greater in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), which account for 90% of deaths attributable to burns. 4 Within all countries, poverty increases the likelihood of burn injuries and death; this is even more pronounced when there are disparities in countrywide income leading to socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.Background: Standardized estimates of global economic losses from burn injuries are lacking. The primary objective of this study was to determine the global macroeconomic consequences of burn injuries and their geographic distribution. Methods: Using the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation database (2009 and 2019), mean and 95% uncertainty interval (UI) data on incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) from injuries caused by fire, heat, and hot substances were collected. Gross domestic product (GDP) data were analyzed together with DALYs to estimate macroeconomic losses globally using a value of lost welfare approach. Results: There were 9 million global burn cases (95% UI, 6.8 to 11.2 million) and 111,000 deaths from burns (95% UI, 88,000 to 132,000 deaths) in 2019, representing a total of 7.5 million DALYs (95% UI, 5.8 to 9.5 million DALYs). This represented welfare losses of $112 billion (95% UI, $78 to $161 billion), or 0.09% of GDP (95% UI, 0.06% to 0.13%). Welfare losses as a share of GDP were highest in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) of Oceania (0.24%; 95% UI, 0.09% to 0.42%) and Eastern Europe (0.24%; 95% UI, 0.19% to 0.30%) compared with high-income country regions such as Western Europe (0.06%; 95% UI, 0.04% to 0.09%). Mortality-incidence ratios were highest in LMIC regions, highlighting a lack of treatment access, with southern sub-Saharan Africa reporting a mortalityincidence ratio of 40.1 per 1000 people compared with 1.9 for Australasia. Conclusions: Burden of disease and resulting economic losses because of burn injuries are substantial worldwide and are disproportionately higher in LMICs. Possible effective solutions include targeted education, advocacy, and legislation to decrease incidence and investing in existing burn centers to improve treatment access.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.