Insects are the most speciose group of animals, but the phylogenetic relationships of many major lineages remain unresolved. We inferred the phylogeny of insects from 1478 protein-coding genes. Phylogenomic analyses of nucleotide and amino acid sequences, with site-specific nucleotide or domain-specific amino acid substitution models, produced statistically robust and congruent results resolving previously controversial phylogenetic relations hips. We dated the origin of insects to the Early Ordovician [~479 million years ago (Ma)], of insect flight to the Early Devonian (~406 Ma), of major extant lineages to the Mississippian (~345 Ma), and the major diversification of holometabolous insects to the Early Cretaceous. Our phylogenomic study provides a comprehensive reliable scaffold for future comparative analyses of evolutionary innovations among insects.

No abstract

Animal venoms have evolved many times. Venomous species are especially common in three of the four main groups of arthropods (Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda), which together represent tens of thousands of species of venomous spiders, scorpions, centipedes, and hymenopterans. Surprisingly, despite their great diversity of body plans, there is no unambiguous evidence that any crustacean is venomous. We provide the first conclusive evidence that the aquatic, blind, and cave-dwelling remipede crustaceans are venomous and that venoms evolved in all four major arthropod groups. We produced a three-dimensional reconstruction of the venom delivery apparatus of the remipede Speleonectes tulumensis, showing that remipedes can inject venom in a controlled manner. A transcriptomic profile of its venom glands shows that they express a unique cocktail of transcripts coding for known venom toxins, including a diversity of enzymes and a probable paralytic neurotoxin very similar to one described from spider venom. We screened a transcriptomic library obtained from whole animals and identified a nontoxin paralog of the remipede neurotoxin that is not expressed in the venom glands. This allowed us to reconstruct its probable evolutionary origin and underlines the importance of incorporating data derived from nonvenom gland tissue to elucidate the evolution of candidate venom proteins. This first glimpse into the venom of a crustacean and primitively aquatic arthropod reveals conspicuous differences from the venoms of other predatory arthropods such as centipedes, scorpions, and spiders and contributes valuable information for ultimately disentangling the many factors shaping the biology and evolution of venoms and venomous species.

Predatory robber flies (Diptera, Asilidae) have been suspected to be venomous due to their ability to overpower well-defended prey. However, details of their venom composition and toxin arsenal remained unknown. Here, we provide a detailed characterization of the venom system of robber flies through the application of comparative transcriptomics, proteomics and functional morphology. Our results reveal asilid venoms to be dominated by peptides and non-enzymatic proteins, and that the majority of components in the crude venom is represented by just ten toxin families, which we have named Asilidin1-10. Contrary to what might be expected for a liquid-feeding predator, the venoms of robber flies appear to be rich in novel peptides, rather than enzymes with a putative pre-digestive role. The novelty of these peptides suggests that the robber fly venom system evolved independently from hematophagous dipterans and other pancrustaceans. Indeed, six Asilidins match no other venom proteins, while three represent known examples of peptide scaffolds convergently recruited to a toxic function. Of these, members of Asilidin1 closely resemble cysteine inhibitor knot peptides (ICK), of which neurotoxic variants occur in cone snails, assassin bugs, scorpions and spiders. Synthesis of one of these putative ICKs, U-Asilidin 1 -Mar1a, followed by toxicity assays against an ecologically relevant prey model revealed that one of these likely plays a role as a neurotoxin involved in the immobilization of prey. Our results are fundamental to address these insights further and to understand processes that drive venom evolution in dipterans as well as other arthropods.Keywords: Asilidae; neurotoxins; cysteine inhibitor knot peptide; arthropod venom evolution; functional morphology; synchrotron micro computed tomography; Asilidin Key Contribution: This study provides the first comprehensive description of the venom system of two robber flies (Asilidae). We reveal a complex venom apparatus and an unusual, enzyme depleted venom with unique proteins, including also a new, neurotoxic ICK peptide.

The earliest branching event in winged insects, one of the core problems regarding early insect evolution, was addressed using characters of the head. The head is arguably one of the most complex body regions in insects and the phylogenetic information content of its features has been demonstrated. In contrast, the wings and other body parts related to the flight apparatus and sperm transmission are not useful in the context of this problem, as the outgroups (silverfish and bristletails) are wingless and transmit spermatophores externally. Therefore, they show profound differences in the organization of the postcephalic body, and assessment of homology and subsequent phylogenetic analysis of features of these body regions is extremely difficult. The core of this study is the investigation of head structures of representatives of the major clades of dragonflies. A detailed description of the head of Lestes virens is presented and was used as a starting point for the compilation of a character set and a character state matrix for the entire Dicondylia (winged insects + silverfish), with a main focus on the placement of dragonflies and consequently the basal branching event within winged insects. Our results indicate a sister-group relationship between a clade Palaeoptera (dragonflies + mayflies) and the megadiverse monophyletic lineage Neoptera. We show that despite considerable structural similarity between the odonate and neopteran mandible, the muscle equipment in dragonflies is more plesiomorphic with respect to Dicondylia than previously known. Odonata and Ephemeroptera also share presumably derived features of the antenna, maxilla, and labial musculature. Parsimony analyses of the head data unambiguously support a clade Palaeoptera.Ó The Willi Hennig Society 2012.Whole tagmata have been successfully used to infer insect phylogenies Friedrich and Beutel, 2010). Generally, head, thorax and abdomen each provide a rich set of phylogenetically informative characters. However, in the case of the earliest branching events within winged insects (Pterygota), i.e. the relationships between dragonflies (Odonata), mayflies (Ephemeroptera), and all remaining winged insects (Neoptera), fundamental problems become apparent. Evolution of the flight apparatus caused a drastic redesign of the thoracic morphology. This makes a reliable homologization of several thoracic elements between wingless (apterygote) and winged (pterygote) lineages highly problematic (Beutel and Gorb, 2006). In a phylogenetic context, the definition of characters (primary homology hypotheses) is often difficult or impossible. This impedes a formal phylogenetic evaluation of thoracic features using the outgroup criterion. A similar dilemma exists with characters related to the reproductive system due to the drastically different mode of sperm transfer, i.e. externally deposited spermatophores versus internal fertilization using an intromittent organ (Boudreaux, 1979;Witte and Doring,

Insects show a great variety of mouthpart and muscle configurations; however, knowledge of their mouthpart kinematics and muscle activation patterns is fragmentary. Understanding the role of muscle groups during movement and comparing them between insect groups could yield insights into evolutionary patterns and functional constraints. Here, we developed a mathematical inverse dynamic model including distinct muscles for an insect head-mandiblemuscle complex based on micro-computed tomography (µCT) data and bite force measurements. With the advent of µCT, it is now possible to obtain precise spatial information about muscle attachment areas and head capsule construction in insects. Our model shows a distinct activation pattern for certain fibre groups potentially related to a geometry-dependent optimization. Muscle activation patterns suggest that intramandibular muscles play a minor role in bite force generation, which is a potential reason for their loss in several lineages of higher insects. Our model is in agreement with previous studies investigating fast and slow muscle fibres and is able to resolve the spatio-temporal activation patterns of these different muscle types in insects. The model used here has a high potential for large-scale comparative analyses on the role of different muscle setups and head capsule designs in the megadiverse insects in order to aid our understanding of insect head capsule and mouthpart evolution under mechanical constraints.

Insects show a plethora of different mandible shapes. It was advocated that these mandible shapes are mainly a function of different feeding habits. This hypothesis was tested on a larger sampling of non-holometabolan biting-chewing insects with additional tests to understand the interplay of mandible function, feeding guild, and phylogeny. The results show that at the studied systematic level, variation in mandible biting-chewing effectivity is regulated to a large extent by phylogenetic history and the configuration of the mandible joints rather than the food preference of a given taxon. Additionally, lineages with multiple mandibular joints such as primary wingless hexapods show a wider functional space occupation of mandibular effectivity than dicondylic insects (¼ silverfish + winged insects) at significantly different evolutionary rates. The evolution and occupation of a comparably narrow functional performance space of dicondylic insects is surprising given the low effectivity values of this food uptake solution. Possible reasons for this relative evolutionary "stasis" are discussed.

Tong et al. comment on the accuracy of the dating analysis presented in our work on the phylogeny of insects and provide a reanalysis of our data. They replace log-normal priors with uniform priors and add a "roachoid" fossil as a calibration point. Although the reanalysis provides an interesting alternative viewpoint, we maintain that our choices were appropriate.