2016
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.132399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Musculoskeletal modeling of the dragonfly mandible system as an aid to understanding the role of single muscles in an evolutionary context

Abstract: Insects show a great variety of mouthpart and muscle configurations; however, knowledge of their mouthpart kinematics and muscle activation patterns is fragmentary. Understanding the role of muscle groups during movement and comparing them between insect groups could yield insights into evolutionary patterns and functional constraints. Here, we developed a mathematical inverse dynamic model including distinct muscles for an insect head-mandiblemuscle complex based on micro-computed tomography (µCT) data and bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the subsequent closing phase, the mandibles contacted the food particle and generated a bite force. The predicted maximum bite force of 0.39 N was 0.08 N higher than the maximum measured bite force (0.31 N) in a similarly sized different dragonfly species [33], thus it can be assumed that the MDA model was predicting physiologically reasonable muscle forces and joint reaction as was also shown in former sensitivity studies [34,35]. The MDA model is available as electronic supplementary material, file 1_MDA_model_lestes.bin.…”
Section: (B) Multibody Dynamics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…During the subsequent closing phase, the mandibles contacted the food particle and generated a bite force. The predicted maximum bite force of 0.39 N was 0.08 N higher than the maximum measured bite force (0.31 N) in a similarly sized different dragonfly species [33], thus it can be assumed that the MDA model was predicting physiologically reasonable muscle forces and joint reaction as was also shown in former sensitivity studies [34,35]. The MDA model is available as electronic supplementary material, file 1_MDA_model_lestes.bin.…”
Section: (B) Multibody Dynamics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Muscles 0md6 and 0md8 are attached lateral and postero-lateral within the mandible, respectively. They enable a dorso-lateral and postero-dorsal movement of the mandible and support in this function the main abductor 0md3 [4]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feeding process usually requires a complex interaction of several specially shaped mouthpart elements – labrum, mandibles, maxillae and labium - moved in a concerted action by muscles through specialised joints supplemented by membranous regions. Such coordinated movements of the mouthparts were studied in exemplary insects using for example tomographic filming techniques [3], but remain poorly understood concerning muscle activation [4] and neuronal control [5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Onychogomphus, a medium-sized dragonfly, shows a bite force which is higher than the bite force of Cordulegaster, one of the largest dragonflies in Europe (figure 1b, [10] are presented for direct comparison with the specimens studied here.…”
Section: Dragonfly Bite Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In all dragonfly species, the mandibles are connected to the head with two ball-and-socket joints each; the muscle equipment consists of a large single mandibular adductor, an abductor and a varying set of three or four smaller associated adductors [8,[11][12][13]. It has been shown [10] & 2016 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%