Immunosignaturing shows promise as a general approach to diagnosis. It has been shown to detect immunological signs of infection early during the course of disease and to distinguish Alzheimer’s disease from healthy controls. Here we test whether immunosignatures correspond to clinical classifications of disease using samples from people with brain tumors. Blood samples from patients undergoing craniotomies for therapeutically naïve brain tumors with diagnoses of astrocytoma (23 samples), Glioblastoma multiforme (22 samples), mixed oligodendroglioma/astrocytoma (16 samples), oligodendroglioma (18 samples), and 34 otherwise healthy controls were tested by immunosignature. Because samples were taken prior to adjuvant therapy, they are unlikely to be perturbed by non-cancer related affects. The immunosignaturing platform distinguished not only brain cancer from controls, but also pathologically important features about the tumor including type, grade, and the presence or absence of O6-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation promoter (MGMT), an important biomarker that predicts response to temozolomide in Glioblastoma multiformae patients.

Study Type – Prognosis (inception cohort) Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Large population screening trials like the ERSPC, PCPT and PLCO have noted that men with seemingly low PSA (even as low as 0.5 ng/dL) still can have prostate cancer. Despite these findings, PSA is still predominantly used as a current indicator for possible presence of prostate cancer rather than also serving as a prognostic marker. This study examines a larger number of men in a diverse US population to determine the prognostic value of a man’s baseline or first PSA. OBJECTIVES • To assess the value of a PSA threshold of 1.5 ng/mL as a predictor of increased prostate cancer risk over a four‐year period based on a man’s first PSA test, including racial differences. • To review the risk of progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) based on a similar PSA threshold. PATIENTS AND METHODS • A retrospective review involving 21 502 men from a large Midwestern health system was performed. • Men at least 40 years old with baseline PSA values between 0 and 4.0 ng/mL and at least four years of follow‐up after initial PSA test were included. • Optimal PSA threshold and predictive value of PSA for development of prostate cancer were calculated. RESULTS • Prostate cancer rates were 15‐fold higher in patients with PSA ≥1.5 ng/mL vs patients with PSA <1.5 ng/mL (7.85% vs 0.51%). • African American patients with baseline PSA <1.5 ng/mL faced prostate cancer rates similar to the whole study population (0.54% vs 0.51%, respectively), while African American patients with PSA 1.5–4.0 ng/mL faced a 19‐fold increase in prostate cancer. CONCLUSION • Both Caucasian and African American men with baseline PSA values between 1.5 and 4.0 ng/mL are at increased risk for future prostate cancer compared with those who have an initial PSA value below the 1.5 ng/mL threshold. • Based on a growing body of literature and this analysis, it is recommended that a first PSA test threshold of 1.5 ng/mL and above, or somewhere between 1.5 and 4.0 ng/mL, represent the Early‐Warning PSA Zone (EWP Zone). • This should serve to inform patients and clinicians alike to future clinical activities with respect to prostate cancer and BPH.

No abstract

This study validates that the UWIN questionnaire can be used in place of the American Urological Association symptom score. The UWIN questionnaire will lessen the burden on the respondent, broaden the applicability of the instrument and make collecting data as efficient and effective as possible.