Patients with cleft lip and/or palate go through a lifelong journey of multidisciplinary care, starting from before birth and extending until adulthood. Presurgical orthopedic (PSO) treatment is one of the earliest stages of this care plan. In this paper we provide a review of the PSO treatment. This review should help general and specialist dentists to better understand the cleft patient care path and to be able to answer patient queries more efficiently. The objectives of this paper were to review the basic principles of PSO treatment, the various types of techniques used in this therapy, and the protocol followed, and to critically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of some of these techniques. In conclusion, we believe that PSO treatment, specifically nasoalveolar molding, does help to approximate the segments of the cleft maxilla and does reduce the intersegment space in readiness for the surgical closure of cleft sites. However, what we remain unable to prove equivocally at this point is whether the reduction in the dimensions of the cleft presurgically and the manipulation of the nasal complex benefit our patients in the long term.
Pre-eruptive coronal resorption (PCR) is a rare phenomenon affecting unerupted permanent teeth. The aetiology of PCR is unknown and is often detected as an incidental finding. The prognosis of affected teeth can be extremely variable and may involve multidisciplinary management. The lower second permanent molars are commonly affected. The following is a description of three clinical cases of PCR affecting lower permanent molars in orthodontic patients.
INTRODUCTION:The free fibular osteocutaneous flap has become the workhorse flap for reconstruction of the head and neck when bony support and soft tissue coverage and/or mucosal lining are needed. However, the donor site often requires skin grafting and is a potential site for additional complications and increased morbidity. Here, we describe the free fibula osteofascial flap as a reliable option for composite head and neck reconstruction that allows for primary closure of the donor site defect.
METHODS:Preliminary results on four patients undergoing mandible reconstruction with free fibula fascia flaps at the University of California San Francisco were evaluated and included in our study. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, oncologic and reconstructive operations, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS:Four patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity underwent segmental mandibulectomy with radical neck dissections and were reconstructed using the free fibula osteofascial flap. The soleus/peroneal fascia was dissected from the skin and muscle while preserving the perforators which were included in the composite flap in all patients. Two patients were found to have no cutaneous perforators that would have supported a skin paddle. Fibular osteotomies were performed using custom made templates for mandibular reconstruction. The soleus/peroneal fascia was use to reconstruct the floor of mouth and provide coverage of the bony construct and hardware. The fascia was left to mucosalize, and the donor sites were closed primarily and healed in all cases without complication. There were no flap related complications.
CONCLUSION:The free fibula osteofascial flap is a refinement of the traditional free fibula osteocutaneous flap and provides suitable bone length along with a reliable piece of fascia that can be used to reconstruct bony defects as well as provide soft tissue for coverage and lining. The donor site can then be closed primarily thereby precluding the need for skin grafting and associated donor site complications. While this flap is not indicated for every composite head/neck reconstruction, it represents an innovative option in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.