20 years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry, 2nd edn. (2009)

Cash, Alex

doi:10.1093/ejo/cjq105

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, these absorbable materials could avoid the need for a second surgery and the delayed wound healing process. Non-resorbable materials were prone to be exposed to the oral environment to increase the risk of post-operative infection [69]. Several subjects were available for the examination of vertical clinical attachment level (CAL-V) gain at 12 and 120 months after GTR therapy.…”

Section: Pdl Regenerationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontal Bone-Ligament-Cementum Regeneration via Scaffolds and Stem Cells

Liu

Ruan

Weir

et al. 2019

Cells

176

140

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontitis is a prevalent infectious disease worldwide, causing the damage of periodontal support tissues, which can eventually lead to tooth loss. The goal of periodontal treatment is to control the infections and reconstruct the structure and function of periodontal tissues including cementum, periodontal ligament (PDL) fibers, and bone. The regeneration of these three types of tissues, including the re-formation of the oriented PDL fibers to be attached firmly to the new cementum and alveolar bone, remains a major challenge. This article represents the first systematic review on the cutting-edge researches on the regeneration of all three types of periodontal tissues and the simultaneous regeneration of the entire bone-PDL-cementum complex, via stem cells, bio-printing, gene therapy, and layered bio-mimetic technologies. This article primarily includes bone regeneration; PDL regeneration; cementum regeneration; endogenous cell-homing and host-mobilized stem cells; 3D bio-printing and generation of the oriented PDL fibers; gene therapy-based approaches for periodontal regeneration; regenerating the bone-PDL-cementum complex via layered materials and cells. These novel developments in stem cell technology and bioactive and bio-mimetic scaffolds are highly promising to substantially enhance the periodontal regeneration including both hard and soft tissues, with applicability to other therapies in the oral and maxillofacial region.

show abstract

Section: Pdl Regenerationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontal Bone-Ligament-Cementum Regeneration via Scaffolds and Stem Cells

Liu

Ruan

Weir

et al. 2019

Cells

176

140

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Understanding surface and interface properties of modified Ti50Zr with nanotubes

Pantazi

Vardaki

Mihai

et al. 2020

Applied Surface Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Xenogenic Bone Graft: A Comparison Between the Flap and Subperiosteal Tunneling Techniques

Hamed

Arini

2021

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of minimal invasive horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using small incision and subperiosteal tunneling technique.Methods: This study was conducted on 10 partially edentulous patients with horizontal alveolar bone deficiency in 12 areas that need horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation for future implant placement. Cone beam computer tomography was done for sites that need implant placement preoperatively. Xenogeneic bone was used for grafting deficient horizontal alveolar ridge sites using the flap technique in 6 areas and using the subperiosteal tunneling technique in another 6 areas for future implant placement. Cone beam computer tomography was done for grafted sites immediately postoperative and 6 months postoperative.Results: This study was conducted on 10 patients and included 12 implant sites. No complications related to bone grafting were found and there was an adequate clinical prognosis.Regarding the difference from pre-operatively to 6 months post-operatively, a slightly higher increase in ridge width was recorded in subperiosteal tunnel group (1.48±0.99) in comparison to flap group (0.91±0.94), with no statistically significant difference (p=0.086). Conclusions:The bone graft material retained within a pouch formed using small incision and subperiosteal tunneling technique resulted in additional increase within the width of the alveolar ridge than the flap technique.

show abstract

20 years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry, 2nd edn. (2009)

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Periodontal Bone-Ligament-Cementum Regeneration via Scaffolds and Stem Cells

Periodontal Bone-Ligament-Cementum Regeneration via Scaffolds and Stem Cells

Understanding surface and interface properties of modified Ti50Zr with nanotubes

Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Xenogenic Bone Graft: A Comparison Between the Flap and Subperiosteal Tunneling Techniques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About