Recent analysis of the cannabinoid content of cannabis plants suggests a shift towards use of high potency plant material with high levels of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and low levels of other phytocannabinoids, particularly cannabidiol (CBD). Use of this type of cannabis is thought by some to predispose to greater adverse outcomes on mental health and fewer therapeutic benefits. Australia has one of the highest per capita rates of cannabis use in the world yet there has been no previous systematic analysis of the cannabis being used. In the present study we examined the cannabinoid content of 206 cannabis samples that had been confiscated by police from recreational users holding 15 g of cannabis or less, under the New South Wales “Cannabis Cautioning” scheme. A further 26 “Known Provenance” samples were analysed that had been seized by police from larger indoor or outdoor cultivation sites rather than from street level users. An HPLC method was used to determine the content of 9 cannabinoids: THC, CBD, cannabigerol (CBG), and their plant-based carboxylic acid precursors THC-A, CBD-A and CBG-A, as well as cannabichromene (CBC), cannabinol (CBN) and tetrahydrocannabivarin (THC-V). The “Cannabis Cautioning” samples showed high mean THC content (THC+THC-A = 14.88%) and low mean CBD content (CBD+CBD-A = 0.14%). A modest level of CBG was detected (CBG+CBG-A = 1.18%) and very low levels of CBC, CBN and THC-V (<0.1%). “Known Provenance” samples showed no significant differences in THC content between those seized from indoor versus outdoor cultivation sites. The present analysis echoes trends reported in other countries towards the use of high potency cannabis with very low CBD content. The implications for public health outcomes and harm reduction strategies are discussed.
Alternative splicing expands the transcriptome thereby promoting protein diversity. It governs critical cellular processes such as differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis in a tissue-specific manner. Aberrant splicing consequent to mutations in splicing factors and disruption of isoform ratios in key regulatory genes provides an important contribution to the pathogenesis of the myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloid leukemia. We review here the central role of alternative splicing in regulating myelopoiesis, and provide clear examples of how global splicing disruption or specific aberrant splicing events might promote leukemogenesis. We discuss the growing number of mechanistic links between epigenetic factors and alternative splicing. Finally, we address the potential utility of alternatively spliced isoforms as biomarkers and the development of novel therapies that modulate alternative splicing in myeloid and other malignancies.
Conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) are continuously replenished by bone marrow-derived precursors called pre-DCs, which traffic through the blood to peripheral tissues. Pre-DCs are a heterogeneous population that includes cDC subset-committed progenitors, namely pre-cDC1 and pre-cDC2, which give rise to mature cDC1 and cDC2, respectively. Regulation of pre-DC subset trafficking is thought to aid the host response to immune challenge. However, the molecular cues regulating pre-cDC1 versus pre-cDC2 trafficking toward peripheral sites during homeostasis and disease remain elusive. Here, we report that pre-cDC1 but not pre-cDC2 express the T helper type 1-associated chemokine receptor CXCR3. Moreover, we identify a cell-intrinsic role for CXCR3 in the trafficking of pre-cDC1 to melanoma tumors but not to non-inflamed organs. We also show that tumor cDC1 numbers can be increased pharmacologically by targeting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (CD26), a negative regulator of CXCR3 ligands. Our findings demonstrate that pre-cDC1 trafficking is regulated distinctly from pre-cDC2, which is relevant for our understanding of the DC lineage in the context of cancer and inflammation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.