No abstract

Incomplete excision of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) may be followed by recurrence of the tumor. In order to detect risk factors for incomplete excision of BCCs we performed a cross-sectional study of 1278 patients who underwent a primary excision of BCCs, during a four-year period, within an ambulatory and hospital plastic surgery department setting. Incomplete excision occurred in 159 of 1478 primary excisions of BCCs (10.8%) and was significantly associated with location of the tumors in the eyelids (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.96-6.71), ears (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.25-4.94), naso-labial folds (OR 2.26, 95% CI 0.99-5.04) and nose (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.71). There was an inverse association with location of the tumors in the upper limbs (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90), back (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.48) or chest (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.00-0.57). Baso-squamous differentiation was associated with incomplete excision of BCCs (p = 0.03). No association was observed between incomplete excision of BCCs and gender, age, setting of the operation (ambulatory vs. hospital), clinical appearance of the lesion (suspected BCCs vs. other diagnoses) or diameter of the lesions. In conclusion, incomplete excision of BCCs was associated with location of the tumors in the eyelids, ears, naso-labial folds and nose. We recommend that in patients with BCCs located in these sites, surgeons should commence particular surgical measures to avoid inadequate excisions of the tumors.

We recommend that in patients with SCCs located in the forehead, temples, periauricular region, ears, cheeks, nose, lips or neck surgeons should commence particular surgical measures to avoid inadequate excisions of the tumors. In particular, surgeons should use wider excisional margins in tumors located in the embryonic fusion planes (e.g. eyelids and naso-labial folds).

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

No abstract

Escharectomy using an effective enzymatic debriding agent is potentially an adequate, simple, fast and effective procedure to treat BICS, it has the added benefit of burn debridement without surgical escharotomy.

We describe a 53-year-old woman who had a huge pleomorphic liposarcoma of the left breast. She had a left Halstead mastectomy, which left a huge defect in the chest wall. We did an immediate reconstruction of the chest wall with combined latissimuss dorsi musculocutaneous (for the upper half of the defect) and vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (for the lower half of the defect). She then had radiotherapy and chemotherapy during which time the flaps remained viable and provided satisfactory coverage for the irradiated area. Unfortunately four months later she was diagnosed with spinal cord and lung metastases and died seven months after the operation.

Silver sulfadiazine 1% cream (SSD) and biafine (an oil-inwater emulsion containing alginate) are used for the treatment of superficial partial-thickness burns, but comparative effectiveness studies are lacking. Objectives: To compare the uses of SSD, Biafine (Labortoires Medix, Houdan, France), and saline-soaked gauze in the treatment of superficial partial-thickness burns in pigs. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in four anesthetized young pigs. Four equal sets of partial-thickness contact burns were inflicted on the pigs. Each burn was randomly assigned to treatment with biafine, SSD, or saline-soaked gauze with dressing changes every other day. Assessment of wound re-epithelialization was performed every other day, for a total of two weeks. The treatment groups were compared by univariable and multivariable analyses of variance (ANOVAs), controlling for the pig and the location of the burns on each pig. Results: Thirty-two burns were inflicted on the pigs. Time to re-epithelialization of the burns was 13.5 days (SD 6 0.9 days) in pigs treated with biafine, 13.3 days (61.3 days) in pigs treated with SSD, and 13.5 days (61.0 days) in pigs treated with saline-soaked gauze (p = not significant [NS] ) in pigs treated with saline-soaked gauze (p = NS). A multivariable ANOVA showed a similar decrease in burn area between the treatment arms (p = NS) and a significant difference between the pigs (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Partial-thickness porcine burns treated with SSD, biafine, and soaked saline gauze re-epithelialize at similar rates.