By real-time RT-PCR and Western blot analysis, we found that phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) mRNA and protein abundance was several fold higher in human male than in female reproductive tracts. The highest mRNA level (>1 x 10(7) molecules/microg total RNA) was detected in human corpora cavernosa (CC), where PDE5 protein was immunolocalized in both muscular and endothelial compartment. The possible role of androgens in regulating PDE5 expression was studied using a previously established rabbit model of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. In this model, hypogonadism reduced, and testosterone (T) supplementation restored, CC PDE5 gene and protein expression. In addition, T supplementation completely rescued and even enhanced cyclic GMP conversion to metabolites, without changing IC(50) for sildenafil (IC(50) = 2.16 +/- 0.62 nm). In control CC strips, sildenafil dose-dependently increased relaxation induced by electrical field stimulation, with EC(50) = 3.42 +/- 1.7 nm. Hypogonadism reduced, and T increased, sildenafil effect on electrical field stimulation, again without changing their relative EC(50) values. CC sensitivity to the NO-donor NCX4040 was greater in hypogonadal rabbit strips than in control or T-treated counterparts. Moreover, sildenafil enhanced NCX4040 effect in eugonadal rabbit strips but not in hypogonadal ones. This suggests that androgens up-regulate PDE5 in rabbit penis. We also measured PDE5 gene expression and metabolic activity in human CC from male-to-female transsexual individuals, chronically treated with estrogens and cyproterone acetate. Comparing the observed values vs. eugonadal controls, PDE5 mRNA, protein, and functional activity were significantly reduced. In conclusion, we demonstrated, for the first time, that androgens positively regulate PDE5, thus providing a possible explanation about the highest abundance of this enzyme in male genital tract.
Concerns over penile size and a desire for a longer penis are common in the male population. The number of male patients seeking an andrological consultation for the problem of 'short penis' is increasing. We looked at the numbers of patients presenting to a University andrology clinic over a 2-y period and correlated their perceived penis size with the accepted norms. Sixty-seven patients were evaluated with a median age of 27 (range 16 -55) complaining of 'short penis' and requesting surgical correction. Clinical history, including the IIEF-5 questionnaire and an accurate physical examination were obtained. Data concerning measures of penile length and circumference were recorded in both the flaccid and fully stretched states and compared to the normal reference range as previously described in the nomogram we recently published (Eur Urol 2001; 39: 183 -186.). All patients were also asked to estimate the length of a normal sized penis.Fourty-four (65.7%) complained of a short penis only while flaccid, 22 patients (32.8%%) while both flaccid and erect, and only one patient (1.5%) was worried only by the erect length of the penis. Fifteen (22.4%) also complained about their penile circumference. Fifty-seven (85%) patients thought a 'normal' penile length should range from 10 to 17 cm (median value of 12 cm). Ten patients (15%) were not able to estimate 'normal' penile size. No patient was found to have a penile length under the 2.5 percentile according to our nomogram. Forty-two (62.7%) subjects recalled the problem starting in childhood, when they felt that their penis was smaller than their friends'. In 25 patients (37.3%) the problem started in the teenage years after seeing erotic images. Our data show that most men who seek penile lengthening surgery overestimate 'normal' penile length. In our series, none of the patients could be classified as having a severely short penis according to our nomogram and none had any anatomical penile abnormality. Most found the use of a nomgram to show them how they compared with other men helpful. We suggest that documentation of such a demonstration should be made for any man seeking an opinion on penile lengthening surgery.
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lifestyle change on couples of reproductive age and on their desire for parenthood. Materials and methods: A quantitative correlational research study, based on a web survey, was conducted among Italian men and women in heterosexual stable relationships, aged between 18 and 46 years. The self-administered Italian version questionnaire was created using Google Forms and posted on chats and social networks.The mood of participants before and during the quarantine was assessed using a scale from 1 to 10 (1 ¼ no wellbeing; 10 ¼ total wellbeing). Couples' quality of life and their reproductive desire were evaluated. Results: 1482 respondents were included: 944 women (63.7%) and 538 men (36.3%). A significant trend toward reduced mean wellbeing scores during the quarantine, compared to before, was found (p < .01). From 18.1% participants who were planning to have a child before the pandemic, 37.3% abandoned the intention, related to worries of future economic difficulties (58%) and consequences on pregnancy (58%). Of 81.9% who did not intend to conceive, 11.5% revealed a desire for parenthood during quarantine than before (p < .01), related to will for change (50%) and need for positivity (40%). 4.3% of these actually tried to get pregnant. Stratifying by age, a trend toward older ages was found in the desire for parenthood before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < .05). Conclusions: COVID-19 pandemic is impacting on the desire for parenthood. It is unknown whether these findings will result in a substantial modification of birth rate in the near future. ARTICLE HISTORY
Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate how individual and couple's sexuality had changed during the COVID-19 pandemic related quarantine. Methods A quantitative correlational research study was conducted, using a web-based survey. Results 1576 participants were involved: 1018 women (64.6%) and 558 men (35.4%). A significant decline in the mean wellbeing scores during the quarantine, compared to before, was reported. A positive correlation between the wellbeing scores and the number of sexual intercourse (SI) before and during the quarantine was found. The mean number of SI decreased significantly during the quarantine. The main reasons were: poor privacy (43.2%) and lack of psychological stimuli (40.9%). 1124 respondents (71.3%) did not report sexual desire (SD) reduction. A positive association between SD and SI during the quarantine was found. 61.2% did not report autoerotism reduction. In those who reported decreased masturbation activity, the main causes were poor privacy (46.4%) and lack of desire (34.7%). We found that men presented lower SD during the quarantine, than women ( p <0.01). Conclusion Potentially, the more time available might lead couples to reconnect at an intimate level and to improve their sexuality. However, the majority of quarantined participants experienced reduced number of SI per week, with poor household privacy and lack of psychological stimuli as cited causes, even as a majority did not report reduced autoeroticism.
Introduction Results for prosthesis implantation from everyday clinical practice within Europe are few. This report provides data on the most commonly used penile prostheses (the American Medical Systems [AMS] series). Aim The study aimed to assess, retrospectively, complications and patient satisfaction with AMS penile implants in 253 consecutive patients with erectile dysfunction from three European centers. Methods Pre, intra- and postoperative data were obtained from chart review, with a mean follow-up of 60 months; 200 patients were available for evaluation. Patient satisfaction data were collected using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. Main Outcome Measure Complications and patient satisfaction were assessed. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a standardized assessment tool (the modified EDITS questionnaire). Results Major postoperative complications occurred in 40 (20%) patients, including 9 (22.5%) prosthesis infections, 18 (45%) mechanical failures, and 13 (32.5%) erosions. Patient satisfaction with the AMS 700CX, AMS Ambicor, and AMS 600-650 was 97%, 81%, and 75%, respectively; dissatisfaction was 0%, 5%, and 6%, respectively. Partner satisfaction with the AMS 700CX, AMS Ambicor, and AMS 600-650 was 91%, 91%, and 75%, respectively; dissatisfaction was 0%, 5%, and 6%, respectively. Erections were more natural (harder) than before with the AMS 700CX, AMS Ambicor, and AMS 600-650 in 91%, 85%, and 88%, respectively; hardness was the same as before in 9%, 15%, and 13%, respectively; no erections were less hard than before. Conclusions Postoperative complications differed from those reported in the literature, while patient satisfaction rates were roughly similar. The reporting of specific data for different implant types, plus the use of standardized assessment tools for patient satisfaction is significant as in the future, it will allow comparison of data between centers performing penile prosthesis implants using these devices.
We have demonstrated that adenosine has potent relaxant activity on the rabbit corpus cavernosum, acting through the A2a subtype receptor for adenosine. We now report studies on the identification and functional characterization of adenosine receptors in human penile vessels. To identify A2 receptors in human corpora cavernosa (HCC) we performed binding studies using the selective radioligand [125I]PAPA-APEC in membranes from HCC. We found the presence of a single class of high affinity (Kd= 0.23 +/- 0.06 nM), low capacity (Bmax=134 +/- 37 fmoles/mg protein) binding sites. Adenosine and CGS 21680 completely displaced [125I]PAPA-APEC binding (Kd= 146.7 +/- 64 microM and 51.52 +/- 27 nM, respectively). Accordingly, in functional studies adenosine relaxed phenylephrine precontracted HCC with an IC50=2.28 +/- 0.17 mM. The effect of adenosine was independent from nitric oxide (NO), and was counteracted by the A2 antagonist CGS 15943. In order to evaluate the in vivo effect of adenosine, increasing concentrations (6, 60, 600 microg) of adenosine or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (10 microg) were injected into the corpora cavernosa of four healthy volunteers. Blood flow and erectile response were evaluated at different times by duplex sonography and visual inspection, respectively. It was found that adenosine increased cavernosal peak blood flow velocity in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The highest concentrations of injected adenosine elicited a response that was not statistically different from that of PGE1 (10 microg). However, in contrast to PGE1, a full or partial erection was never obtained. To further investigate the lack of effect of adenosine on penile tumescence (despite the substantial increase in cavernosal blood flow), in vitro experiments were performed on human deep dorsal penile veins (DDPV) obtained from surgical ligation for impotence. Adenosine did not affect basal tone, but it induced almost complete relaxation in noradrenaline-precontracted vein strips with an IC50=1.6 +/- 0.22 mM. Conversely, PGE1 stimulated a sustained increase in basal tone. Therefore, the lack of effect of adenosine on penile tumescence could be due to a simultaneous relaxing activity on penile corpora cavernosa and veins. In conclusion, our study indicates that adenosine relaxes HCC as well as penile veins without affecting erection, at least at the concentrations we have used. Conversely, PGE1 relaxes corpora cavernosa as well as adenosine but strongly stimulates vein contraction, allowing penile tumescence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.