Introduction. Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular neoplasm in children. With the advances in medicine, the armamentarium of available treatment modalities has grown. Intraarterial chemotherapy is a relatively new treatment method with promising outcomes. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate its role in the management of retinoblastoma. Methods. A systematic online search was conducted using Ovid Embase and Ovid Medline. The final results included 23 studies. The studies were published between 2011 and 2019. The studies evaluated the technical success rate of IAC, globe salvage rate, and ocular and systemic complications, as well as the occurrence of deaths, metastasis, and secondary neoplasms. In total, 1827 eyes with retinoblastoma were analysed. The follow-up was between 0 and 252 months. Results. Overall globe retention rate ranged from 30% to 100%. Sixteen out of 23 studies reported ocular salvage between 60 and 80%. Eyelid oedema and erythema were the most commonly reported ocular complications following IAC. The most common systemic complications included nausea, vomiting, and neutropenia. Metastases and deaths were reported in 6 out of 23 studies. Three studies reported the development of secondary neoplasms. The technical success rate of IAC procedure ranged from 91% to 100%. Discussion. The studies have shown that IAC is a safe and effective treatment for advanced retinoblastoma, especially group D. It allows to save the globe without compromising patients’ survival. Local and systemic complications are acceptable. The role of IAC in less advanced tumours is yet to be established. Future work should focus on conducting larger prospective studies with longer follow-up. Multiple novel therapies for the management of retinoblastoma are currently being tested, including angiogenic inhibitors and targeted agents. The results seem to be promising. Future advances require a further in-depth understanding of unique genetics of retinoblastoma and complex interactions between tumour cells and their microenvironment.
Purpose Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) is a partial thickness corneal graft which involves replacing a recipient’s Descemet’s membrane and endothelium with healthy tissue. Main advantages include rapid visual recovery, fewer higher order aberrations and low rejection rate. However, DMEK is technically challenging and requires advanced surgical skills. The aim of the audit was to assess visual outcomes of DMEK performed at Luton and Dunstable University Hospital (L&D), United Kingdom. Methods Data was collected retrospectively from April 2015 to November 2018. 57 eyes were analysed (31 male, 26 female). Patient demographic data were collected, as well as indication for surgery and pre‐operative visual acuity. Post‐operative follow‐up visits were analysed, including assessment of visual acuity, complications and graft failure and rejection. Results Pre‐operative visual acuity (Snellen chart) ranged from worse than 6/60 to 6/6. At an average of 6 months post operatively 87% of patients achieved 6/12 vision or better. At 1 year post procedure 59% of patients achieved 6/6 vision or better. At 2 years follow‐up 63% of patients achieved 6/6 vision or better. The most common DMEK related complications were steroid induced raised IOP (n = 9), partial graft detachment or dislocation (n = 8) and need for re‐bubbling (n = 7). 5 patients were listed for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Conclusions Most patients undergoing DMEK procedure in L&D Hospital achieve 6/12 vision or better from 6 months onwards. Outcomes at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years are in‐line with the guidelines set by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and previously published data. These are re‐assuring findings which suggest that more advanced corneal techniques can be carried out at single surgeon sites. Future work should aim to collect long term data on outcomes.
Purpose Assessing disease activity in Birdshot uveitis can be challenging. The peak time of the 30 Hz flicker photopic electroretinogram (ERG) was shown to be sensitive for detecting retinal dysfunction. ERG testing is not readily available in many eye units. We investigated use of a portable device to obtain recordings in the clinic setting and compared these with conventional recordings. Methods Patients underwent testing with the portable device (RETeval, LKC Technologies) and conventional equipment (Espion ColorDome, Diagnosys). For portable recordings pupils were undilated and skin electrodes used; for conventional recordings a conductive fibre electrode was used with mydriasis. Flicker ERG peak times were recorded and were deemed abnormal if they exceeded the 95th centile from a healthy cohort (>190 healthy volunteers). Results 18 patients with Birdshot uveitis underwent recordings. Recordings with the portable device took c. 3 min and were well‐tolerated. Mean (SD) age was 56.3 (12.8) years. For portable recordings, mean (SD) peak times were 30.1 (3.7) and 30.2 (3.9) ms for right and left eyes respectively. For conventional recordings mean (SD) peak times were 31.4 (3.9) and 31.8 (4.0) ms respectively. Peak times were significantly shorter with the portable device (p = 0.026 and 0.002 for right and left eyes). Correlation between devices was high (0.83 and 0.89 for right and left eyes) and highly significant (p < 0.0001). Strength of agreement between the two methods was good (kappa statistic 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36‐0.92). Conclusions Correlation between the portable and conventional ERG recordings was high with a good level of agreement. Recordings were rapid and well‐tolerated. There were significant differences in peak times between the two methods highlighting the importance of normative data specific to each device.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.