BackgroundRecently, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has become the rewarming treatment of choice in hypothermic cardiac arrest. The detailed indications for extracorporeal rewarming in non-arrested, severely hypothermic patients with circulatory instability have not been established yet. The primary purpose of the study was a preliminary analysis of all aspects of the treatment process, as well as initial identification of mortality risk factors within the group of severely hypothermic patients, treated with arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). The secondary aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy of VA-ECMO in initial 6-h period of treatmentMethodsFrom July 2013 to June 2016, thirty one hypothermic patients were accepted for extracorporeal rewarming at Severe Accidental Hypothermia Center, Cracow. Thirteen patients were identified with circulatory instability and were enrolled in the study. The evaluation took into account patients’ condition on admission, the course of therapy, and changes in laboratory and hemodynamic parameters.ResultsNine out of 13 analyzed patients survived (69%). Patients who died were older, had lower both systolic and diastolic pressure, and had increased creatinine an potassium levels on admission. In surviving patients, arterial blood gases parameters (pH, BE, HCO3) and lactates would normalize more quickly. Their potassium level was lower on admission as well. The values of the core temperature on admission were comparable. Although normothermia was achieved in 92% of patients, none of them had been weaned-off VA-ECMO in the first 6 h of treatment.Discussion and ConclusionsIn our preliminary study more pronounced markers of cardiocirculatory instability and organ hypoperfusion were observed in non-survivors. Future studies on indications to extracorporeal rewarming in severely hypothermic, non-arrested patients should focus on the extent of hemodynamic disturbances. Short term (<6 h) treatment in severe hypothermic, non-arrested patients seems to be not clinically appropriate.

(Cardiol J 2019; 26, 1: 77-86)

The most important cause of OHCA is coronary artery disease, in particular ACS. UCA and PCI seem to be important elements of appropriate post-resuscitation care because such treatment could improve survival but it is still unclear whether PCI might influence neurological outcomes as well.

Please cite this article in press as: Kosinski S, et al. The longest persisting ventricular fibrillation with an excellent outcome -6 h 45 min cardiac arrest. Resuscitation (2016), http://dx.

Annals welcomes letters to the editor, including observations, opinions, corrections, very brief reports, and comments on published articles. Letters to the editor should not exceed 500 words and 5 references. They should be submitted using Annals' Web-based peer review system, Editorial Manager TM (http://www.editorialmanager.com/annemergmed). Annals no longer accepts submissions by mail.Letters should not contain abbreviations. Financial association or other possible conflicts of interest should always be disclosed, and their presence or absence will be published with the correspondence. Letters discussing an Annals article must be received within 8 weeks of the article's publication.

No abstract

No abstract

Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated during the COVID-19 pandemic might experience prolonged time to reperfusion. The delayed reperfusion may potentially aggravate the risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in those patients. Limited access to healthcare, more reluctant health-seeking behaviors, and bystander readiness to render life-saving interventions might additionally contribute to the suggested change in the risk of OHCA in STEMI. Thus, we sought to explore the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on treatment delay and clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI with OHCA. Overall, 5,501 consecutive patients with STEMI complicated by OHCA and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation were enrolled. A propensity score matching was used to obviate the possible impact of non-randomized design. A total of 740 matched pairs of patients with STEMI and OHCA treated before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared. A similar mortality and prevalence of periprocedural complications were observed in both groups. However, patients treated during the COVID-19 outbreak experienced longer delays from first medical contact to angiography (88.8 (±61.5) vs. 101.4 (±109.8) [minutes]; p = 0.006). There was also a trend toward prolonged time from pain onset to angiography in patients admitted to the hospital in the pandemic era (207.3 (±192.8) vs. 227.9 (±231.4) [minutes]; p = 0.06). In conclusion, the periprocedural outcomes in STEMI complicated by OHCA were comparable before and during the COVID-19 era. However, treatment in the COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a longer time from first medical contact to reperfusion.