BackgroundRemnant lipoproteins (RLPs), the triglyceride‐enriched precursors to low‐density lipoprotein, are an emerging risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). We sought to determine the association of RLP cholesterol (RLP‐C) levels with incident CHD in 2 diverse, prospective, longitudinal observational US cohorts.Methods and ResultsWe analyzed cholesterol levels from serum lipoprotein samples separated via density gradient ultracentrifugation in 4114 US black participants (mean age 53.8 years, 64% women) from the Jackson Heart Study and a random sample of 818 predominantly white participants (mean age 57.3 years, 52% women) from the Framingham Offspring Cohort Study. Multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for RLP‐C (the sum of very low‐density lipoprotein3 cholesterol and intermediate‐density lipoprotein cholesterol) were derived to estimate associations with incident CHD events consisting of myocardial infarction, CHD death, and revascularizations for each cohort separately and as a combined population. There were 146 CHD events in the combined population. After adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, blood pressure, diabetes, and lipid‐lowering therapy for the combined population, RLP‐C (HR 1.23 per 1‐SD increase, 95% CI 1.06–1.42, P<0.01) and intermediate‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 1.26 per 1‐SD increase, 95% CI 1.08–1.47, P<0.01) predicted CHD during an 8‐year follow‐up. Associations were attenuated by high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and ultimately lost significance with inclusion of real low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, which excludes Lp(a) and IDL cholesterol fractions. Similar associations were seen in multivariable analyses within each cohort.Conclusion RLP‐C levels are predictive of incident CHD in this diverse group of primary prevention subjects. Interventions aimed at reducing RLP‐C to prevent CHD warrant further intensive investigation.Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00415415.

In secondary prevention, increased risk for long-term hard clinical events is associated with low HDL3-C, but not HDL2-C or HDL-C, highlighting the potential value of subclassifying HDL-C.

Aims We aimed to clarify the associations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) subclasses with incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in two large primary prevention cohorts. Methods We measured cholesterol at baseline from the two major HDL subfractions (larger, more buoyant HDL2 and smaller, denser HDL3) separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation in 4114 (mean age 53.8 years; 64% female) African American participants from the Jackson Heart Study and 818 (mean age 57.3 years, 52% female) predominantly Caucasian participants from the Framingham Offspring Cohort Study. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for HDL-C and its subclasses were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate associations with incident CHD events including myocardial infarction, CHD death, and revascularization. Analyses were performed for each cohort separately and as a combined population. Results In models adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors for the combined population, HDL3-C (HR 0.76 per SD increase; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62–0.94; p = 0.01), rather than HDL2-C (HR 0.88 per SD; 95% CI, 0.72–1.09; p = 0.24) drove the inverse association of HDL-C (HR 0.79 per SD; 95% CI, 0.64–0.98; p = 0.03) with CHD. Similar associations were seen in multivariable analyses within each cohort including after adjusting for apolipoprotein A1 in the Jackson Heart Study. Conclusion Smaller, denser HDL3-C levels are primarily responsible for the inverse association between HDL-C and incident CHD in this diverse group of primary prevention subjects. These findings have important implications ranging from considerations of HDL biology to interpretations of clinical trials utilizing HDL-C therapeutics.

Background Remnants are partially-hydrolyzed, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins that, like other apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, are atherogenic. Prior observational studies suggest paradoxically better outcomes in hypercholesterolemic patients who sustain an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), one of several known recurrent risk paradoxes. To date, the association of directly-measured remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C) with survival has not been examined after an AMI. Methods We examined 2,465 AMI survivors in TRIUMPH, a prospective, 24-center US study of AMI outcomes. Lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions were directly measured by ultracentrifugation. RLP-C was defined as IDL-C+VLDL3-C. Given a linear relationship between RLP-C and mortality, we examined RLP-C by tertiles and continuously. Cox regression hazard ratios were adjusted for the GRACE score and 23 other co-variates. Results Participants were 58±12 years old (mean±SD) and 68% were men. After 2 years of follow-up, 226 (9%) participants died. The mortality proportion was 12.4% in the lowest tertile of RLP-C (0–15 mg/dL), 8.5% in the middle tertile (16–23 mg/dL), and 6.8% in the highest tertile (24–120 mg/dL) (p<0.001). A one SD increase in RLP-C (11 mg/dL) predicted a 24% lower adjusted risk of 2-year mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.64–0.91). Similar results were found for a one SD increase in IDL-C (HR per 8 mg/dL, 0.80; 0.67–0.96), VLDL3-C (HR per 4 mg/dL, 0.74; 0.61–0.89), and VLDL-C (HR per 8 mg/dL, 0.69; 0.55–0.85). Conclusion In conclusion, higher RLP-C levels were associated with lower mortality 2 years after AMI despite rigorous adjustment for known confounders. Unknown protective factors, or a lead-time bias, likely explain the paradox.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide determining dramatic impacts on healthcare systems. Early identification of high-risk parameters is required in order to provide the best therapeutic approach. Coronary, thoracic aorta and aortic valve calcium can be measured from a non-gated chest computer tomography (CT) and are validated predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. However, their prognostic role in acute systemic inflammatory diseases, such as COVID-19, has not been investigated. Objectives The aim was to evaluate the association of coronary artery calcium and total thoracic calcium on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. Methods 1093 consecutive patients from 16 Italian hospitals with a positive swab for COVID-19 and an admission chest CT for pneumonia severity assessment were included. At CT, coronary, aortic valve and thoracic aorta calcium were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated separately and combined together (total thoracic calcium) by a central Core-lab blinded to patients’ outcomes. Results Non-survivors compared to survivors had higher coronary artery [Agatston (467.76±570.92 vs 206.80±424.13 mm 2 , p<0.001); Volume (487.79±565.34 vs 207.77±406.81, p<0.001)], aortic valve [Volume (322.45±390.90 vs 98.27±250.74 mm2, p<0.001; Agatston 337.38±414.97 vs 111.70±282.15, p<0.001)] and thoracic aorta [Volume (3786.71±4225.57 vs 1487.63±2973.19 mm2, p<0.001); Agatston (4688.82±5363.72 vs 1834.90±3761.25, p<0.001)] calcium values. Coronary artery calcium (HR 1.308; 95% CI, 1.046 - 1.637, p=0.019) and total thoracic calcium (HR 1.975; 95% CI, 1.200 - 3.251, p=0.007) resulted to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion Coronary, aortic valve and thoracic aortic calcium assessment on admission non-gated CT permits to stratify the COVID-19 patients in-hospital mortality risk.

Background and aims The potential impact of coronary atherosclerosis, as detected by coronary artery calcium, on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients remains unsettled. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of clinical and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD), as assessed by coronary artery calcium score (CAC), in a large, unselected population of hospitalized COVID-19 patients undergoing non-gated chest computed tomography (CT) for clinical practice. Methods SARS-CoV 2 positive patients from the multicenter (16 Italian hospitals), retrospective observational SCORE COVID-19 (calcium s core for CO VID-19 R isk E valuation) registry were stratified in three groups: (a) “clinical CAD” (prior revascularization history), (b) “subclinical CAD” (CAC >0), (c) “No CAD” (CAC = 0). Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality and the secondary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident (MI/CVA). Results Amongst 1625 patients (male 67.2%, median age 69 [interquartile range 58–77] years), 31%, 57.8% and 11.1% had no, subclinical and clinical CAD, respectively. Increasing rates of in-hospital mortality (11.3% vs. 27.3% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001) and MI/CVA events (2.3% vs. 3.8% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001) were observed for patients with no CAD vs. subclinical CAD vs clinical CAD, respectively. The association with in-hospital mortality was independent of in-study outcome predictors (age, peripheral artery disease, active cancer, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, LDH, aerated lung volume): subclinical CAD vs. No CAD: adjusted hazard ratio (adj-HR) 2.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–7.17, p= 0.025); clinical CAD vs. No CAD: adj-HR 3.74 (95% CI 1.21–11.60, p= 0.022). Among patients with subclinical CAD, increasing CAC burden was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (20.5% vs. 27.9% vs. 38.7% for patients with CAC score thresholds≤100, 101–400 and > 400, respectively, p < 0.001). The adj-HR per 50 points increase in CAC score 1.007 (95%CI 1.001–1.013, p= 0.016). Cardiovascular risk factors were not independent predictors of in-hospital mortality when CAD presence and extent were taken into account. Conclusions The presence and extent of CAD are associated with in-hospital mortality and MI/CVA among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease and they appear to be a better prognostic gauge as compared to a clinical cardiovascular ri...

No abstract

The role of percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in the management of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis has come under the spotlight following the development of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) technique. Previous indications for BAV were limited to symptom palliation and as a bridge to definitive therapy for patients undergoing conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). In the TAVI era, BAV may also be undertaken to assess the ‘therapeutic response’ of a reduction in aortic gradient in borderline patients often with multiple comorbidities, to assess symptomatic improvement prior to consideration of definitive TAVI intervention. This narrative review aims to update the reader on the current indications and practical techniques involved in undertaking a BAV procedure. In addition, a summary of the haemodynamic and clinical outcomes, as well as the frequently encountered procedural complications is presented for BAV procedures conducted during both the pre-TAVI and post-TAVI era.