SynopsisWe examined the diets of 12 morphologically diverse syngnathid species in shallow seagrass-dominated marine waters of south-western Australia to determine whether they differed among species that varied in body form, size and snout morphology, and in particular whether species with long snouts ingested more mobile prey. Although all species consume mainly small crustaceans, the dietary compositions of these species often vary markedly. We suggest that these differences are related to factors that influence both their foraging capabilities and/or locations. Those species with long snouts (e.g. the common seadragon Phyllopteryx taeniolatus and long-snouted pipefish Vanacampus poecilolaemus) consume far more relatively mobile prey than species with short snouts. Species with short snouts (e.g. the pug-nosed pipefish Pugnaso curtirostris and Macleay's crested pipefish Histiogamphelus cristatus) mainly consume slow moving prey. Spotted pipefish, Stigmatopora argus, and wide-bodied pipefish, Stigmatopora nigra, restrict their diets to planktonic copepods, probably because their small gape size limits their ability to feed on alternative larger prey. Both the short-snouted seahorse, Hippocampus breviceps, and West Australian seahorse, Hippocampus subelongatus, ingest mainly slow-moving prey, even though the latter species possesses a moderately long snout. This may reflect the fact that seahorses are weak swimmers that anchor themselves to vegetation or the substrate with a strongly prehensile tail and rarely venture into open water to pursue mobile prey. In contrast, the relatively large P. taeniolatus, which resides above, rather than within, the macrophyte canopy, consumes mysids, which aggregate in open water above the seabed. Those pipefishes with characters that imply relatively enhanced mobility, such as well developed caudal fins and non-prehensile tails, are trophically diverse, suggesting that they are able to feed either on the sediment or phytal surfaces or in the water column.

Fish faunas were sampled seasonally using a large and a small beam trawl in three seagrass habitats comprising predominantly Amphibolis griffithii or Posidonia sinuosa or Posidonia coriacea, which differ in seagrass and meadow structure. Amphibolis griffithii and P. sinuosa both produce a relatively dense leaf canopy, but the former exhibits a distinct architecture, with the leaf canopy overlying relatively open spaces surrounding woody stems, compared to the uniformly dense blade-like leaves of P. sinuosa which emerge directly from the sediment. In comparison, P. coriacea provides a landscape of patchy seagrass amongst areas of bare sand. Since the latter seagrass habitat contains large areas of sand, fish were also sampled in adjacent unvegetated areas. The number of species and density of fish were greater (P\u3c0.05) in P. sinuosa than in either A. griffithii or P. coriacea. The mean number of species caught using the large trawl ranged from 16 to 24 in the first of these habitats compared to 14–21 and 9–15 in the last two habitats, respectively, and the mean densities ranged between 78 and 291 fish 1000 m−2 in P. sinuosa compared to 31–59 fish 1000 m−2 in A. griffithii and 31–59 fish 1000 m−2 in P. coriacea. The biomass of fish was greater (P\u3c0.05) in both P. sinuosa and A. griffithii than in P. coriacea (4.2–5.3 kg and 3.3–6.2 kg versus 0.7–1.9 kg 1000 m−2, respectively). Furthermore, the size-structure of fish differed among these habitats, where the median weight of fish was 72.1 g in A. griffithii, compared to 7.5 g and 19.8 g in P. sinuosa and P. coriacea, respectively. Ordination and ANOSIM demonstrated that the species-composition differed markedly among the three seagrass habitats (P\u3c0.001), suggesting that fish species display a distinct preference for particular seagrasses characterised by different architecture. Differences in species-composition among the seagrass habitats partly reflected the size-composition of fish in each habitat. The open space below the canopy of A. griffthii is likely to allow larger fish to occupy this habitat, whereas only small fish would be able to penetrate the dense foliage of P. sinuosa. Differences in species- and size-composition of fish among these habitats may be the result of settlement-sized larvae discriminating between particular seagrass and meadow structures, or fish being subject to different levels of predation and/or accessibility to food or space. The species-composition in P. coriacea was highly dispersed and did not differ from that of unvegetated areas. While several species were associated with both P. coriacea and bare-sand habitats, some species did display a high affinity with the seagrass P. coriacea. This may reflect an association with the sparse and narrower leaves of this seagrass or with the patchy occurrence of the seagrass Heterozostera tasmanica, which commonly occurs as an understorey in this habitat

No abstract

No abstract