2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-004-2597-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the dietary compositions of morphologically diverse syngnathid fishes

Abstract: SynopsisWe examined the diets of 12 morphologically diverse syngnathid species in shallow seagrass-dominated marine waters of south-western Australia to determine whether they differed among species that varied in body form, size and snout morphology, and in particular whether species with long snouts ingested more mobile prey. Although all species consume mainly small crustaceans, the dietary compositions of these species often vary markedly. We suggest that these differences are related to factors that influ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(70 reference statements)
5
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of harpacticoid copepods as a food source for pipefish is also described for other species of syngnathids (Tripton & Bell 1988). However, prey composition varies among syngnatid species due to morphological differences such as snout length and species mobility (Kendrick & Hyndes 2005). Since data on the diet of Entelurus aequoreus are limited to fish taken from the S. muticum bed, results are biased and are not suggested to cover the entire spectrum of potential prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of harpacticoid copepods as a food source for pipefish is also described for other species of syngnathids (Tripton & Bell 1988). However, prey composition varies among syngnatid species due to morphological differences such as snout length and species mobility (Kendrick & Hyndes 2005). Since data on the diet of Entelurus aequoreus are limited to fish taken from the S. muticum bed, results are biased and are not suggested to cover the entire spectrum of potential prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They inhabit a variety of habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass meadows, mangroves, estuaries and open bottom habitats, although their distribution can be patchy and sparse (Perante, 2002;Foster & Vincen, 2004;Rosa et al, 2007). Seahorses are weak swimmers and tend to anchor themselves to vegetation or the substrate using a strong prehensile tail (Kendrick & Hyndes, 2005), and rely on prey coming within close range instead of actively pursuing them Lourie et al, 2004;Felício et al, 2006). As a result, they are highly localized with small home ranges, and life history characteristics such as low fecundity, lengthy parental care, and mate fidelity make them particularly vulnerable to overexploitation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S eahorses are carnivorous fish that hide in strategic places along the edges of reefs or seagrass beds waiting for prey to come within striking reach 1 . Seahorses capture highly evasive prey such as small shrimp or larval fishes 1,2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seahorses capture highly evasive prey such as small shrimp or larval fishes 1,2 . To do so, they make use of a two-phase prey-capture mechanism that is commonly referred to as pivot feeding 3,4 : a rapid upward rotation of the head is followed by suction to draw the prey into the seahorse's snout.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%