In this paper, a technique that can automatically detect and classify objects buried under the ground is proposed. The technique employs a ground‐penetrating radar that transmits electromagnetic waves in order to strike the objects and then receives the backscattering electromagnetic wave to perform signal processing. This signal processing is divided into four main steps as follows. First, preprocessing is used to reduce the clutter due to the effect of the media layer interface. Second, the late time of the scattering signal is estimated using a simple cross correlation. Third, a few successive poles are extracted from the scattering response at the estimated late time by using the short‐time matrix pencil method. Finally, the extracted poles are fed for object classification with different constitutions and/or shapes using a support vector machine. Simulations according to the practical situation in three southern provinces of Thailand to counter the improvised explosive devices were set up. The performance of the proposed technique was evaluated. The simulation results showed that the proposed technique can efficiently detect and classify buried objects for counter‐improvised explosive device operations in the military.
This paper proposes a conceptual technique for the simple estimation of the late‐time response for radar target identification without a priori knowledge of the target geometry or orientation. In the proposed technique, the cross correlation between the backscattering response and transmitted wave is performed. Peaks will occur in the cross‐correlation output when the transmitted wave is aligned with the same features in the received backscattering response. The commencement of the late‐time response corresponds with the peak resulting from a superimposed pattern between the transmitted wave and late‐time response. The matrix pencil method was exploited in order to extract the poles from the received backscattering response. Several simulations were performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimation technique. The simulation results confirmed the superiority of the proposed approach. In the special case of the transmission with a monocycle pulse, the commencement of the late‐time response can be automatically selected from the third peak of the resulting cross‐correlation output.
An investigation on the improvement of the resolution of a radar target identification system is presented in this paper. Degradation of resolution is mainly due to influence factors associated with antennas, including the strong coupling between transmitting and receiving antennas and the variation in the antenna response. A filtering technique was therefore introduced to mitigate the underlying problem. In the technique, the antenna effects were filtered out of the total response backscattered from the objects in the radar target identification system. The short-time matrix pencil method (STMPM) was then employed to extract the poles from the backscattered response in order to identify the object. Simulation and experimentation examples are illustrated to confirm the improvement of the resolution by filtering the antenna effects. The simulation and experimentation were divided into several categories, that is, different antennas and differently shaped objects, in order to validate the advantage of filtering the antenna effects. They were setup in order to demonstrate that the poles obtained from performing the STMPM without the filtering technique were mainly because of the antenna rather than the object’s characteristic. The results showed that the resolution of the identification was significantly increased when performing pole extraction and filtering the antenna effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.