2015 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements &Amp; Applications (CAMA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cama.2015.7428148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) for counter improvised-explosive devices in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These poles are aspect independent and depend upon the geometry and physical properties of the target [ Sarkar and Pereira , ]. There have been many attempts, as seen in Boonpoonga [], Yochanang et al [], Bannawat et al [], Grant and Crow [], and Sarkar and Pereira [], to extract poles from the late‐time response. One of the most popular methods is the MPM because of its performance in dealing with noise [ Sarkar and Pereira , ].…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These poles are aspect independent and depend upon the geometry and physical properties of the target [ Sarkar and Pereira , ]. There have been many attempts, as seen in Boonpoonga [], Yochanang et al [], Bannawat et al [], Grant and Crow [], and Sarkar and Pereira [], to extract poles from the late‐time response. One of the most popular methods is the MPM because of its performance in dealing with noise [ Sarkar and Pereira , ].…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research has been conducted on the detection and identification for the system by utilizing scattered EM fields. There have been many attempts to resolve the problem of detecting and characterizing unknown objects, with different shapes and constitutions, as seen in examples [ Boonpoonga , ; Yochanang et al , ; Liu et al , ; Bannawat et al , ; Chantasen et al , ; Carroll and Rachford , ] One of the most popular solutions for target identification is to use the resonance phenomena of the EM field scattered from the object under the hypothesis that the geometry and physical properties of the object are associated with its natural resonance frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last few decades, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) has received considerable interest when searching for buried objects (see, e.g., Boonpoonga, ; Cedrina et al, ; Gonzalez‐Huici & Giovanneschi, ; Wang et al, ; Xie et al, ) because of the ability to nondestructively detect buried objects beneath shallow earth surface. The GPR that can image the subsurface with a high spatial resolution offers the promise of detecting metallic and nonmetallic land mines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex natural frequency, called a pole, which is extracted from the late‐time response, is a tool for aspect‐independent target identification. There are many published works dealing with extracting poles from the scattering response (see examples in Bannawat et al, ; Boonpoonga, ; Chantasan et al, ; Chantasen et al, ; Kheawprae et al, ; Yochanang et al, ). The matrix pencil method (MPM) proposed in Sarkar and Pereira () to extract poles has drawn considerable attention because of its performance in dealing with noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since over half a century, radar target identification systems have been intensely investigated in research areas of electromagnetic (EM) wave propagations and signal processing. There are many potential applications of the system, such as air defense, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and chipless RFID identification systems [1][2][3][4][5]. The challenging problem in the system is identifying unknown objects with different shapes and constituents, buried or not underground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%