Long-held ideas regarding the evolutionary relationships among animals have recently been upended by sometimes controversial hypotheses based largely on insights from molecular data. These new hypotheses include a clade of moulting animals (Ecdysozoa) and the close relationship of the lophophorates to molluscs and annelids (Lophotrochozoa). Many relationships remain disputed, including those that are required to polarize key features of character evolution, and support for deep nodes is often low. Phylogenomic approaches, which use data from many genes, have shown promise for resolving deep animal relationships, but are hindered by a lack of data from many important groups. Here we report a total of 39.9 Mb of expressed sequence tags from 29 animals belonging to 21 phyla, including 11 phyla previously lacking genomic or expressed-sequence-tag data. Analysed in combination with existing sequences, our data reinforce several previously identified clades that split deeply in the animal tree (including Protostomia, Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa), unambiguously resolve multiple long-standing issues for which there was strong conflicting support in earlier studies with less data (such as velvet worms rather than tardigrades as the sister group of arthropods), and provide molecular support for the monophyly of molluscs, a group long recognized by morphologists. In addition, we find strong support for several new hypotheses. These include a clade that unites annelids (including sipunculans and echiurans) with nemerteans, phoronids and brachiopods, molluscs as sister to that assemblage, and the placement of ctenophores as the earliest diverging extant multicellular animals. A single origin of spiral cleavage (with subsequent losses) is inferred from well-supported nodes. Many relationships between a stable subset of taxa find strong support, and a diminishing number of lineages remain recalcitrant to placement on the tree.

No abstract

Monoplacophorans are among the rarest members of the phylum Mollusca. Previously only known from fossils since the Cambrian, the first living monoplacophoran was discovered during the famous second Galathea deep-sea expedition. The anatomy of these molluscs shocked the zoological community for presenting serially repeated gills, nephridia, and eight sets of dorsoventral pedal retractor muscles. Seriality of organs in supposedly independent molluscan lineages, i.e., in chitons and the deep-sea living fossil monoplacophorans, was assumed to be a relict of ancestral molluscan segmentation and was commonly accepted to support a direct relationship with annelids. We were able to obtain one specimen of a monoplacophoran Antarctic deep-sea species for molecular study. The first molecular data on monoplacophorans, analyzed together with the largest data set of molluscs ever assembled, clearly illustrate that monoplacophorans and chitons form a clade. This ''Serialia'' concept may revolutionize molluscan systematics and may have important implications for metazoan evolution as it allows for new interpretations for primitive segmentation in molluscs.Antarctica ͉ deep sea ͉ Mollusca ͉ Monoplacophora ͉ phylogeny

No abstract

Understanding why some organisms reproduce by sexual reproduction while others can reproduce asexually remains an important unsolved problem in evolutionary biology. Simple demography suggests that asexuals should outcompete sexually reproducing organisms, because of their higher intrinsic rate of increase. However, the majority of multicellular organisms have sexual reproduction. The widely accepted explanation for this apparent contradiction is that asexual lineages have a higher extinction rate.A number of models have indicated that population size might play a crucial role in the evolution of asexuality. The strength of processes that lead to extinction of asexual species is reduced when population sizes get very large, so that the long-term advantage of sexual over asexual reproduction may become negligible. Here, we use a comparative approach using scale insects (Coccoidea, Hemiptera) to show that asexuality is indeed more common in species with larger population density and geographic distribution and we also show that asexual species tend to be more polyphagous. We discuss the implication of our findings for previously observed patterns of asexuality in agricultural pests. K E Y W O R D S :General purpose genotype, parthenogenesis, polyphagy, population size, scale insects.

Armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Diaspididae) are major economic pests and are among the world's most invasive species. Here we describe a system of specimen and identification management that establishes a basis for well-vouchered molecular identification. We also present an expanded Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated fragments of 4 genetic loci: the large ribosomal subunit (28S), elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1α), cytochrome oxidase I and II (COI‒II), and the small ribosomal subunit (16S) of the primary endosymbiont, Uzinura diaspidicola (Bacteroidetes: Flavobacteriales). Our sample includes 1,389 individuals, representing 11 outgroup species and at least 311 described and 61 undescribed diaspidid species. The results broadly support Takagi's 2002 classification but indicate that some revisions are needed. We propose a revised classification recognizing 4 subfamilies: Ancepaspidinae Borchsenius, new rank, Furcaspidinae Balachowsky, new rank, Diaspidinae Targioni Tozzetti, and Aspidiotinae Westwood. Within Aspidiotinae, in addition to the existing tribes Aspidiotini Westwood, Parlatoriini Leonardi, Odonaspidini Ferris, Leucaspidini Atkinson, and Smilacicolini Takagi, we recognize as tribes Gymnaspidini Balachowsky, new rank, and Aonidiini Balachowsky, new rank. Within Diaspidinae we recognize the 2 tribes Lepidosaphidini Shimer and Diaspidini Targioni Tozzetti, and within Diaspidini we recognize three subtribes: Diaspidina Targioni Tozzetti, Fioriniina Leonardi, and Chionaspidina Brues & Melander. We regard Kuwanaspidina Borchsenius as a junior synonym of Fioriniina, Thysanaspidini Takagi as a junior synonym of Leucaspidini, and Protodiaspidina Takagi and Ulucoccinae Takagi as junior synonyms of Chionaspidina. To clarify the composition of the higher taxa we describe 2 new genera for Australian species heretofore misplaced in the genus Ancepaspis Ferris: Brimblecombia Normark (Aonidiini) and Hendersonaspis Normark (Leucaspidini). We also propose many additional minor modifications to the taxonomy of Diaspididae, including the following new combinations, revived combinations, and replacement names: Aonidia edgerleyi (Mamet), new combination (from Bigymnaspis Balachowsky); Aonidomytilus espinosai Porter, revived combination (from Porterinaspis González); Aspidiotus badius (Brain), new combination (this and the next 5 Aspidiotus species all from Aonidia Targioni Tozzetti); Aspidiotus biafrae (Lindinger), new combination; Aspidiotus chaetachmeae (Brain), new combination; Aspidiotus laticornis (Balachowsky), new combination; Aspidiotus rhusae (Brain), new combination; Aspidiotus sclerosus (Munting), new combination; Brimblecombia asperata (Brimblecombe), new combination (this and the next 5 Brimblecombia species all from Ancepaspis); Brimblecombia longicauda (Brimblecombe), new combination; Brimblecombia magnicauda (Brimblecombe), new combination; Brimblecombia reticulata (Brimblecombe), new combination; Brimblecombia rotundicauda (Brimblecombe), new combination; Brimblecombia striata (Brimblecombe), new combination; Cooleyaspis pseudomorpha (Leonardi), new combination (from Dinaspis Leonardi); Cupidaspis wilkeyi (Howell & Tippins), new combination (from Paracupidaspis Howell & Tippins); Cupressaspis isfarensis Borchsenius, revived combination (this species, the next 2 species in Cupressaspis Borchsenius, revived genus, and the next 9 species in Diaspidiotus Cockerell all from Aonidia); Cupressaspis mediterranea (Lindinger), revived combination; Cupressaspis relicta (Balachowsky), new combination; Diaspidiotus atlanticus (Ferris), new combination; Diaspidiotus marginalis (Brain), new combination; Diaspidiotus maroccanus (Balachowsky), new combination; Diaspidiotus mesembryanthemae (Brain), new combination; Diaspidiotus opertus (De Lotto), new combination; Diaspidiotus shastae (Coleman), new combination; Diaspidiotus simplex (Leonardi), new combination; Diaspidiotus visci (Hall), new combination; Diaspidiotus yomae (Munting), new combination; Diaspis arundinariae (Tippins & Howell), new combination (from Geodiaspis Tippins & Howell); Duplachionaspis arecibo (Howell), new combination (this and the next 10 Duplachionaspis MacGillivray species all from Haliaspis Takagi); Duplachionaspis asymmetrica Ferris, revived combination; Duplachionaspis distichlii (Ferris), revived combination; Duplachionaspis litoralis Ferris, revived combination; Duplachionaspis mackenziei McDaniel, revived combination; Duplachionaspis milleri (Howell), new combination; Duplachionaspis nakaharai (Howell), new combination; Duplachionaspis peninsularis (Howell), new combination; Duplachionaspis spartinae (Comstock), revived combination; Duplachionaspis texana (Liu & Howell) new combination; Duplachionaspis uniolae (Takagi), new combination; Duplachionaspis mutica (Williams) (from Aloaspis Williams), new combination; Epidiaspis doumtsopi (Schneider), new combination (from Diaspis Costa); Fiorinia ficicola (Takahashi), new combination (from Ichthyaspis Takagi); Fiorinia macroprocta (Leonardi), revived combination (this and the next 2 species of Fiorinia Targioni Tozzetti all from Trullifiorinia Leonardi); Fiorinia rubrolineata Leonardi, revived combination; Fiorinia scrobicularum Green, revived combination; Genaparlatoria pseudaspidiotus (Lindinger), revived combination (from Parlatoria); Greeniella acaciae (Froggatt), new combination (this and the next 4 Greeniella Cockerell species all from Gymnaspis Newstead); Greeniella cassida (Hall & Williams), new combination; Greeniella grandis (Green), new combination; Greeniella perpusilla (Maskell), new combination; Greeniella serrata (Froggatt), new combination; Hendersonaspis anomala (Green), new combination (from Ancepaspis); Hulaspis bulba (Munting), new combination (this and the next Hulaspis Hall species both from Andaspis MacGillivray); Hulaspis formicarum (Ben-Dov), new combination; Lepidosaphes antidesmae (Rao in Rao & Ferris), new combination (this and the next 19 species all from Andaspis); Lepidosaphes arcana (Matile-Ferrero), new combination; Lepidosaphes betulae (Borchsenius), new combination; Lepidosaphes citricola (Young & Hu), new combination; Lepidosaphes conocarpi (Takagi), new combination; Lepidosaphes crawi (Cockerell), revived combination; Lepidosaphes erythrinae Rutherford, revived combination; Lepidosaphes incisor Green, revived combination; Lepidosaphes indica (Borchsenius), new combination; Lepidosaphes kashicola Takahashi, revived combination; Lepidosaphes kazimiae (Williams), new combination; Lepidosaphes laurentina (Almeida), new combination; Lepidosaphes maai (Williams & Watson), new combination; Lepidosaphes mackieana McKenzie, revived combination; Lepidosaphes micropori (Borchsenius), new combination; Lepidosaphes punicae Laing, revived combination; Lepidosaphes quercicola (Borchsenius), new combination; Lepidosaphes recurrens (Takagi & Kawai), new combination; Lepidosaphes viticis (Takagi), new combination; Lepidosaphes xishuanbannae (Young & Hu), new combination; Lepidosaphes giffardi (Adachi & Fullaway), new combination (from Carulaspis MacGillivray); Lepidosaphes garciniae (Young & Hu), new combination (this and the next 2 species all from Ductofrontaspis Young & Hu); Lepidosaphes huangyangensis (Young & Hu), new combination; Lepidosaphes jingdongensis (Young & Hu), new combination; Lepidosaphes recurvata (Froggatt), revived combination (from Metandaspis Williams); Lepidosaphes ficicola Takahashi, revived combination (this and the next 2 species all from Ungulaspis MacGillivray); Lepidosaphes pinicolous Chen, revived combination; Lepidosaphes ungulata Green, revived combination; Lepidosaphes serrulata (Ganguli), new combination (from Velataspis Ferris); Lepidosaphes huyoung Normark, replacement name for Andaspis ficicola Young & Hu; Lepidosaphes tangi Normark, replacement name for Andaspis schimae Tang; Lepidosaphes yuanfeng Normark, replacement name for Andaspis keteleeriae Yuan & Feng; Leucaspis ilicitana (Gómez-Menor), new combination (from Aonidia); Lopholeucaspis spinomarginata (Green), new combination (from Gymnaspis); Melanaspis campylanthi (Lindinger), new combination (from Aonidia); Mohelnaspis bidens (Green), new combination (from Fiorinia); Parlatoria affinis (Ramakrishna Ayyar), new combination (this and the next 4 Parlatoria species all from Gymnaspis); Parlatoria ficus (Ramakrishna Ayyar), new combination; Parlatoria mangiferae (Ramakrishna Ayyar), new combination; Parlatoria ramakrishnai (Green), new combination; Parlatoria sclerosa (Munting), new combination; Parlatoria bullata (Green), new combination (from Bigymnaspis); Parlatoria leucaspis (Lindinger), new combination (this and the next species both from Cryptoparlatorea Lindinger); Parlatoria pini (Takahashi), new combination; Parlatoria tangi Normark, replacement name for Parlatoria pini Tang; Pseudoparlatoria bennetti (Williams), new combination (from Parlagena McKenzie); Pseudoparlatoria chinchonae (McKenzie), new combination (from Protodiaspis Cockerell); Pseudoparlatoria larreae (Leonardi), revived combination (from Protargionia Leonardi); Quernaspis lepineyi (Balachowsky), new combination (from Chionaspis); Rhizaspidiotus nullispinus (Munting), new combination (from Aonidia); Rolaspis marginalis (Leonardi), new combination (from Lepidosaphes); Salicicola lepelleyi (De Lotto), new combination (from Anotaspis Ferris); Tecaspis giffardi (Leonardi), new combination (from Dinaspis); Trullifiorinia geijeriae (Froggatt), new combination (from Fiorinia); Trullifiorinia nigra (Lindinger), new combination (from Crypthemichionaspis Lindinger); and Voraspis olivina (Leonardi), new combination (from Lepidosaphes).

Neomenioid aplacophorans (= Solenogastres) constitute one of the main lineages of molluscs. Developmental data of early embryogenesis and larval development of neomenioids are available for some species based on histological sections. I used other techniques to study the development of Epimenia babai Salvini-Plawen, 1997, and here I report new data on neomenioid development. The embryos of E. babai are lecithotrophic and cleavage is spiral, unequal, and holoblastic. Two polar lobes are formed, one at the first cleavage stage and one at the second cleavage stage. No evidence of external metameric iteration is visible through scanning electron microscopy or histology at any stage. A ciliated foot, a pedal pit, and aragonitic spicules develop from the definitive ectoderm. A spicule begins as a solid tip, continues to an open-ended hollow spicule, and finally becomes a closed-ended hollow spicule. The free-swimming trochophore larvae of E. babai have been considered unusual in lacking the characteristic neomenioid cellular test, an outer locomotory structure within which the entire definitive adult body develops. However, through the use of scanning electron and light microscopy, semithin sections, Hoechst nuclear staining, and programmed cell death staining to study the ontogeny and fate of the apical cells, I show that the entire pre-oral sphere (the apical cap) of the larvae is similar to the test of the other neomenioids. The results suggest that the test of the neomenioid larvae is an enlarged pre-oral sphere of a trochophore. The test morphologies of neomenioid larvae are compared to those of pericalymma larvae of protobranch bivalves, and the homology and evolution of molluscan larval tests is discussed.

Polyplacophorans, or chitons, are an important group of molluscs, which are argued to have retained many plesiomorphic features of the molluscan body plan. Polyplacophoran trochophore larvae posses several features that are distinctly different from those of their sister trochozoan taxa, including modifications of the ciliated prototrochal cells, the postrochal position of the larval eyes or ocelli, epidermal calcareous spicules, and a collection of serially reiterated epidermal shell plates. Despite these differences, chitons demonstrate a canonical pattern of equal spiral cleavage shared by other spiralian phyla that permits the identification of homologous cells across this animal clade. Cell lineage analysis using intracellular labeling on one chiton species, Chaetopleura apiculata, shows that the ocelli are generated from different lineal precursors (second-quartet micromeres: 2a, 2c) compared to those in all other spiralians studied to date (first-quartet micromeres: 1a, 1c). This situation implies that significant changes have also occurred in terms of the inductive interactions that control eye development in the spiralians. Although radical departures from the spiralian developmental program are seen in some molluscs (i.e., cephalopods), the findings presented here indicate that important changes can occur even within the highly constrained framework of the spiral cleavage program. Among spiralians, variation has been reported for the origin of the anterior, sensory, apical organ, which arises from the 1c and 1d micromeres in C. apiculata. The prototroch of C. apiculata consists of two to three irregular rows of ciliated cells but arise from 1q and 2q daughters, similar to that of Ischnochiton rissoi, as well as the gastropod, Patella vulgata. Despite certain early claims, there is no supporting evidence that any of the shell plates arise pretrochally in C. apiculata. The first seven of eight definitive shell plates that arise in the larva originate from shell secreting grooves in the postrochal region (derived from 2c, 2d, 3d). Earlier descriptions indicate that the eighth plate arises later at metamorphosis, and as this is formed posteriorly, it too forms in the postrochal region. On the other hand, epidermal spicules originate from both pretrochal and postrochal cells (1a,1d, 2a, 2c, 3c, 3d). The significance of these observations is discussed in light of various hypotheses concerning the origin of the conchiferan shell. This study reveals conservation, as well as evolutionary novelty, in the assignment of specific cell fates in the spiralians.