Background: A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab compared with trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC in clinical settings. Methods: Records of patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies who initiated trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab from January 2016 to March 2018 or trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy from June 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed at our institution. Results: Totally, 60 patients received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and 66 received trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy. All patients had previously received standard chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3−5.1] in the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8−2.6) in the trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy group [hazards ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.48−0.99]. PFS rate at 16 weeks was 46.6% for the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and 33.9% for the trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy group. Although a relatively higher incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia was observed in the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group than that in the other group (50.0% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.371), the incidence of febrile neutropenia was not high (3.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.444). Conclusions: In real-world settings, trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab prolonged PFS and helped achieve higher 16-week PFS rate compared with trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC with manageable toxicities. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered
Background A previous phase I/II C-TASK FORCE study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) showed promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab compared with trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC in clinical settings.Methods Records of patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies who initiated trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab from January 2016 to March 2018 or trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy from June 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed at our institution.Results Totally, 60 patients received trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and 66 received trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy. All patients had previously received standard chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3−5.1] in the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8−2.6) in the trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy group [hazards ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.48−0.99]. PFS rate at 16 weeks was 46.6% for the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and 33.9% for the trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy group. Although a relatively higher incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia was observed in the trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab group than that in the other group (50.0% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.371), the incidence of febrile neutropenia was not high (3.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.444).Conclusions In real-world settings, trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab prolonged PFS and helped achieve higher 16-week PFS rate compared with trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC with manageable toxicities.
Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has shown non-inferiority to paclitaxel (PTX) as second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with fewer infusion-related reactions. The efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus ramucirumab (RAM) was reported in a phase II trial; however, there is no randomized trial comparing this regimen with PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus RAM versus PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC.Methods: This study included patients with AGC who received nab-PTX plus RAM from September 2017 to January 2019 or PTX plus RAM from June 2015 to August 2017 as second-line chemotherapy in our hospital.Results: A total of 113 and 138 patients who received nab-PTX plus RAM and PTX plus RAM, respectively, were analyzed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–4.3) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.1–4.7) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.83–1.40; P = 0.573). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.3–12.7) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.5–12.0) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.10; P = 0.188). In patients with moderate/massive ascites, favorable outcomes for progression-free survival were observed in the nab-PTX plus RAM group compared with the PTX plus RAM group. Although anemia and fatigue (any grade) were more frequent in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, discontinuation of study treatment was not increased in the nab-PTX plus RAM group. There was no occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, while two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 hypersensitivity reactions in the PTX plus RAM group.Conclusions: The combination of nab-PTX plus RAM showed a similar efficacy and safety profile to PTX plus RAM as second-line treatment for patients with AGC.
TPS4161 Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor. DESTINY-Gastric01 study showed significantly higher objective response rate with T-DXd than physician's choice of chemotherapy (51.3%, vs. 14.3%, Shitara K, et al. NEJM 2020) as well as prolonged overall survival (median 12.5 vs. 8.4 months, hazard ratio 0.59). Considering that high response rate or major pathological response (MPR), which is defined as the proportion of subjects with < 10% residual tumor may be associated with favorable survival outcomes after preoperative chemotherapy, T-DXd could be a promising neoadjuvant treatment for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. However, to our knowledge, there is no currently ongoing study of T-DXd as a neoadjuvant setting for patients with gastric and GEJ cancers. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, investigator initiated phase 2 trial to evaluate antitumor activity of T-DXd as the neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2 positive gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Eligible patients should have previously untreated locally advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma with clinical stage of T2-4 and/or N+ without distant metastasis. The main cohort will enroll patients with HER2 overexpression defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC)3+ or IHC2+/ in situ hybridization(ISH)+ by local assessment. According to the results of exploratory biomarker analysis of DESTINY-Gastric01 study (Shitara K, et al. ESMO-GI2021), patients with HER2-low expression (IHC1+ or 2+ with ISH negative) with HER2-extra cellular domein (ECD) higher than 11.6 ng/ml also will be enrolled into the exploratory cohort. Patients will receive 3 cycles of T-DXd (6.4mg/kg) by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks followed by surgery at 3 to 8 weeks after last T-DXd infusion.The primary endpoint is MPR rate. The threshold in the main cohort is defined as 20%, and the expected MPR rate was set at 45%. The minimum sample size of this trial is 23 patients in the main cohort (α- and β-error probabilities, 0.1 and 0.15, respectively). Total number of patients will be increased up to 27 patients depending on the enrollment. In addition, 10 patients will be recruited into the exploratory cohort. Secondary endpoints are pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, curative resection rate, and adverse event rate. Biomarker analyses including whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, proteomics, and ctDNA changes will also be conducted using pre- and post-treatment tumor and blood samples. Enrollment is ongoing at six sites in Japan from November 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05034887.
106 Background: E7386 is a novel oral anticancer agent that inhibits the binding of β-catenin to its transcriptional co-activator, CBP, thereby modulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. In preclinical studies, E7386 showed promising activity (eg, modulation of tumor angiogenesis, alteration of the immune microenvironment, and inhibition of tumor growth). At a prior cutoff point for the dose-escalation part of a phase 1 study of E7386 in pts with advanced solid tumors, we reported 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; both grade 3 decreased appetite) with E7386 160 mg twice daily (BID). Here we describe an update of the dose-escalation part of this phase 1 study—we mainly report updated safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy and biomarker results, which led to the inclusion of an additional dose level for investigation in the expansion part of this study. Methods: E7386 was administered orally in escalating doses on a BID continuous schedule in 28-day cycles. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Tolerability was judged by DLTs during cycle 1 (C1). Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks from C1 day (D) 1, or sooner if clinically indicated, and at the end of treatment by investigators using RECIST v1.1. Samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected on C1D1 and C1D8; samples for biomarker analyses were collected at protocol-defined time points. To determine the appropriate dose(s) for the expansion part of this study, additional investigation of the dose-escalation part was conducted. Results: As of the data cutoff (DCO) date (30 June 2022), 36 pts (24 men, 12 women; median age, 61.5 y) were enrolled in E7386 dose cohorts (10 to 160 mg BID). Doses were tolerable up to 120 mg BID. The most common treatment-related AEs (all grades; > 10%) were nausea (80.6%), vomiting (58.3%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (16.7%), and alanine aminotransferase increased, decreased appetite, and diarrhea (13.9% each). Nausea and vomiting were well-controlled with antiemetics such as 5HT3 antagonists, except in the 160 mg BID cohort. Two pts with a Wnt-related adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)- mutation (small bowel adenocarcinoma and desmoid tumor) showed a partial response. As of the DCO date, 2 pts (who continued on-treatment as of that date) had received over 1.5 y of E7386 treatment. The preliminary PK analysis showed plasma exposure of E7386 generally increased with an increasing dose over the assessed dose range. FGF21 levels in plasma increased following E7386 administration. Conclusions: E7386 120 mg BID was tolerated and determined as the recommended dose for the expansion part. Based on additional analyses of the dose-escalation part of this study, further investigation of safety, preliminary efficacy, PK, and biomarker analyses of E7386 is ongoing using 2 dose levels (100 and 120 mg BID) in the expansion part. Clinical trial information: NCT03833700 .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.