Background:Activating mutation of KRAS and BRAF are focused on as potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with anti-EGFR therapies. This study investigated the clinicopathological features and prognostic impact of KRAS/BRAF mutation in advanced and recurrent CRC patients.Method:Patients with advanced and recurrent CRC treated with systemic chemotherapy (n=229) were analysed for KRAS/BRAF genotypes by cycleave PCR. Prognostic factors associated with survival were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model.Results:KRAS and BRAF mutations were present in 34.5% and 6.5% of patients, respectively. BRAF mutated tumours were more likely to develop on the right of the colon, and to be of the poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous carcinoma, and peritoneal metastasis. The median overall survival (OS) for BRAF mutation-positive and KRAS 13 mutation-positive patients was 11.0 and 27.7 months, respectively, which was significantly worse than that for patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS and BRAF (40.6 months) (BRAF; HR=4.25, P<0.001, KRAS13; HR=2.03, P=0.024). After adjustment for significant features by multivariate Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation was associated with poor OS (HR=4.23, P=0.019).Conclusion:Presence of mutated BRAF is one of the most powerful prognostic factors for advanced and recurrent CRC. The KRAS13 mutation showed a trend towards poor OS in patients with advanced and recurrent CRC.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis is commonly considered unresectable, with a poor prognosis. We previously reported the results of the use of cisplatin and S-1 as preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis; docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) have now been investigated for the same purpose. Methods Patients received two or three 28-day cycles of DCS therapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m 2 and cisplatin at 60 mg/m 2 on day 1, S-1 at 40 mg/m 2 twice daily for 2 weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection. After R0 resection, S-1 chemotherapy was given for 1 year. The primary end point was the response rate (RR) to preoperative chemotherapy determined by central peer review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. The planned sample size was 50, with one-sided alpha of 10 %, power of 80 %, expected RR of 80 %, and threshold of 65 %. Results Between July 2011 and May 2013, 53 patients were enrolled, of whom 52 were eligible. The clinical RR was 57.7 % [30/52, 80 % confidence interval 47.9-67.1 %, p = 0.89], and R0 resection was achieved in 84.6 % of patients (44/52). Common grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events during DCS therapy were leukocytopenia (18.9 %), neutropenia (39.6 %), and hyponatremia (15.1 %). The common grade 3 or grade 4 surgical morbidity was abdominal infection (10.2 %). The pathological RR was 50.0 % (26/52). Conclusions Preoperative DCS therapy was feasible but did not show a sufficient RR. Preoperative cisplatin and S-1 therapy is still considered the tentative standard treatment for this population until survival results are known.

Purpose: Expression levels of insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-IR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and HER2 expressions have been linked to clinical outcomes in several solid tumors. However, the clinical significance of these biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. This study was designed to delineate the clinical implications of these three biomarkers in GC. Experimental Design: The study group comprised 87 patients who underwent gastrectomy at National Cancer Center Hospital and subsequently received chemotherapy for recurrent or residual tumors. Using immunohistochemical techniques, we analyzed the expressions of IGF-IR, EGFR, and HER2 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of surgically removed primary tumors.Results: IGF-IR expression (defined as >10% membranous staining) was found in 67 tumors (77%), EGFR expression in 55 (63%), and HER2 expression in 16 (18%). Positive coexpression of IGF-IR and EGFR was found in 48 tumors (55%), that of IGF-IR and HER2 in16 (18%), and that of EGFR and HER2 in 13 (15%). Multivariate survival analysis showed that IGF-IR^positive expression [hazard ratio (HR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20-3.82; P = 0.01], performance status 1 or 2 (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.15-2.91; P = 0.01), and diffuse type tumors (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.08-2.70; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of poor survival. Conclusions: IGF-IR expression in surgical GC specimens, poor performance status, and diffuse type tumors are significant predictors of poor outcomes in patients with GC. Our data suggest that anti^IGF-IR strategies may prove valuable in such patients.

Background. In advanced gastric cancer (AGC), no globally accepted prognostic scoring system has been developed. Therefore, we explored baseline prognostic factors in Japanese AGC patients using the data from a randomized controlled trial, Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 9912, which investigated the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Patients and Methods. Prognostic factors and prognostic indices for overall survival were screened and evaluated in patients enrolled in JCOG9912 using the Cox proportional hazard model. The Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic model was also applied to the JCOG9912 trial. Results. A total of 650 (92.3%) of the 704 patients randomized in the JCOG9912 trial, for whom complete data were available for multivariate analyses, was included in the present study

Smoking is a well-known risk factor for esophageal cancer. However, there are few reports that directly evaluate smoking as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer. Moreover, scarce evidence is available on whether smoking interacts with major treatment modalities of esophageal cancer. In this study we retrospectively analyzed 364 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who were treated between 2001 and 2005 at our institution. Background characteristics, including smoking history, were analyzed as potential prognostic factors. Of the 363 patients, 76 patients (20.9%) were non-smokers or light smokers (nonheavy), whereas 287 patients (79.1%) were heavy smokers. The 5-year survival rate for non-heavy smokers and heavy smokers was 61.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.1-72.2) vs 44.6% (95% CI: 38.2-50.9), respectively. In a multivariate Cox model (adjusted for age, gender, performance status, alcohol consumption, histology, tumor length, International Union Against Cancer [UICC] stage, and treatment), the hazard ratio for heavy smokers in comparison with non-heavy smokers was 1.73 (95% CI: 1.12-2.68; P = 0.013). When we stratified by treatment method, heavy smoking was significantly associated with poor survival only in patients treated by chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI: 1.38-4.27; P = 0.002). More importantly, a statistically significant interaction between heavy smoking history and treatment modality was observed (P = 0.041). Our results indicated that smoking history is strongly associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer, especially those treated by chemoradiotherapy. Further investigation is warranted to explain this different prognosis.

Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) occur in various primary sites, but rarely in the stomach. NETs are classified into three types, carcinoids, malignant carcinoids and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PNECs), whose clinical behavior is different. Currently, clinical outcomes and standard chemotherapy for NETs of the stomach remain unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of histopathologically confirmed NETs of the stomach at our hospital between January 2000 and August 2006. Results Thirty-seven NETs were identified. Fifteen patients had carcinoids while 22 had PNECs. Among the carcinoid patients, 7 underwent endoscopic mucosal resection and 5 had gastrectomy as first-line treatment. Three patients were observed without intervention. All patients were alive after an average follow-up period of 27 months. Among the 22 PNEC patients, 3 had no metastasis, 11 had regional lymph node metastasis, and 8 had distant metastasis. Eight of 14 patients relapsed at a median of 177 days (range 120-1459 days) after curative surgery. Twelve patients with metastatic or recurrent disease received palliative cisplatin plus irinotecan chemotherapy. The response rate was 75%, the median progression-free survival time was 212 days, and median survival time was 679 days. Conclusion Gastric PNEC patients with distant metastasis had poor outcomes. Regimens containing cisplatin plus irinotecan produced a good response in gastric PNEC.